What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Topic: Early warning

Paul Krugman: I’m not sure it’s what I should be best known for, but what I’m best known for is being one of the first to really say that the Bush administration was not to be trusted.  So I was the first . . .  certainly the first major newspaper, Op Ed type writer to say that.  Because I said it even before the . . . even before the 2000 election was held.  So I can go back and point you to columns from the summer of 2000 that I think foreshadow   . . . at least foreshadow the way most people now think about the Bush administration before there even was a Bush administration.

I knew some things that most journalists don’t, like arithmetic.  So I was looking at the policy proposals, and I just said, “They’re lying.  They are . . . they’re not being honest about what it is they’re proposing.”  And that was a pretty good guide.  To me . . . it seemed to me like that was much better evidence than whether Bush seemed like a guy you wanted to have a beer with.

Question: What was a red flag?

Paul Krugman: Social Security.  Bush was basically counting the same couple of trillion dollars twice.  He was saying we can have it available to pay benefits, but we can also invest it and get lots of money out of it.  And it didn’t . . . that didn’t make sense.  Taxes – he was claiming that his tax cuts favored the middle class.  And you could do the math.  They didn’t.  They were very much tilted towards the top.  And there were a bunch of other things, smaller things; but just the clear dishonesty about what was actually in his own policy proposals.  And being the kind of guy I am, if you’re lying about the numbers, that to me is, you know  . . .  It’s not really the worst offense, but it’s the clearest sign that you’re not a man you should be . . . that the public should trust...it’s crazy, right?  In fact you are not going to have a beer with the President.  But you wanted somebody you can trust to run the nation.


Paul Krugman on the Legacy ...

Newsletter: Share: