What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Nicholas Lemann: Well that’s the question. First of all I wanna say a couple of things preliminary to this. Because journalism is not licensed and shouldn’t be licensed, you’re in the realm of . . . you don’t have to go to journalism school to be a journalist. We’re like public policy schools and business schools. The question about us is, “Does it add value to you as an individual to go to our school?” And that to some extent depends on who you are. All professional schools have to answer this question in some way or another. And if they sit inside research universities, in a way it’s easier and in a way it’s harder. The model of Columbia University is that it’s a research university. So the sort of core elements of the university are completely impractical. So in a certain way, all of the professional schools – including the medical school and the law school and so on – are kind of out of sync with the core ideals of the university, which are to do pure research and not people teach people how to do anything practical. So you know if you imagine pure scholarship and research at (10:03) one end, and at the other end a kind of apprenticeship systems, which is how professionals were taught up through the late 19th century; the job of a professional school is to find something in between that. Journalism schools traditionally . . . And there are many different answers to that question. One answer is to teach sort of underlying theoretical material, you know, in the way that you’d learn anatomy in a medical school. Another is to do some kind of version of apprenticeship. Another is to do a kind of workshop model where you do the work of the profession in a sort of slowed down way with a lot more mentorship than you’d get in the outside world. And we do variance of all those things. The tradition of journalism schools in America is that they are known by their critics as trade schools, and known by their fans as craft-oriented schools. In other words they tend to veer to the realm of teaching entry-level job skills, such as in journalism how to write a lead; how to write a nut graph; how to cover a story inside the news cycle in a concise, clear way; and to try to sort of experientially replicate what it’s like to start out in the profession. So the . . . . Myself in particular, I came into Columbia in what . . . you know in the kind of low barrier for drama in higher education would be fairly dramatic circumstances where the president of the university essentially, you know, came in and said, “I don’t think this journalism school or any journalism school is good enough. And the reason is there isn’t enough intellectual analytic content. So my charge in particular was to add that to the school. And so that leads to a different kind of answer to your question about what does a journalist need to know, or how do you teach journalism.  You can teach essentially epistemology . . . applied epistemology and say in a way that you’re teaching journalism. You can teach the history of journalism and say that you’re teaching journalism. We do these things now in our school. I think they’re very useful as part of the intellectual equipment of journalists over their career, but they’re not job skills. So what we try to do is make sure people graduate knowing how to perform in the workplace; but beyond that try to sort of tweak toward teaching you things that you can’t just pick up on the fly in the newsroom.

 

Recorded on: 11/30/07

 

 

 

 

 

Nicholas Lemann: Can journa...

Newsletter: Share: