What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: Are fringe candidates funny?

Mo Rocca:Whatever their motivation to be in the race – and it’s different in every case obviously – I think some of them abase themselves I think just to get attention, because they’re trying to . . . But I think Dennis Kucinich is actually kind of interesting because Dennis Kucinich in the 2000 . . . Yeah. Dennis Kucinich in 2000 and maybe even in 2004 clowned around a lot – I mean to the point that you thought, “Is this guy . . . Does he care about anything?” And I interviewed him them, and I’ve interviewed him this time around and there was no clowning around. And that’s an interesting sign of the times – that the fringe candidate is . . . is immovably serious; is . . . It’s a sign of the times that a fringe candidate like Kucinich is uncompromisingly serious. Because last time around he was willing, when he was single, to put him up for a . . . Last time when he was single, he was willing to put himself up for a mock dating contest on the “Tonight Show”; and all these different things that made you go, “Was he just in this for attention?” But this time he’s been really serious, and I think Gravel is serious too. You know he’s . . . I was in one pressroom for a debate where the reporters were laughing at him; sort of waiting for the wacky comments he was gonna make, and I actually thought that they were great comments. They helped shake the debate out of its pre-scripted torpor, you know and liven it. And I don’t mean that in a condescending way. I mean at one point he say Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization, because I guess Hezbollah, like Hamaas, has an arm that provides social services. And the reporters laughed at him, but it was a provocative, good comment to throw in there and force other people to respond to. I think the fringe candidates are cast in these roles where they’re supposed to be clowns. I think the fringe candidates are cast in roles as clowns, and sometimes they bring it on themselves. But you know Kucinich is somebody that is . . . Dennis Kucinich is an interesting story, because in 2000 and in 2004 it would be fair to say that he made a mockery of himself at different points. And maybe he was just doing this all for an attention grab. In 2008 I’ve interviewed him, and he’s not interested in making a fool of himself. He is really, really serious. And these guys, just like . . . like I’d like to think sometimes a satirist or a humorist can kind of mix things up on a . . . on an otherwise scripted talk show, these fringe candidates do have the power to kind of change the conversation; to jerk it out of its sort of sort of torpor and inject life into it. And you know when I was in the press room for a debate that Mike Gravel was participating in, you know I heard a lot of serious reporters cackling, laughing even before he’d finish a response, like, “Thank God the wacky grandfather is . . . said something outrageous”; except that some of what he was saying was truly provocative. And if people had followed up on it, it would have . . . If other candidates had followed up on it, it would have made a difference. I mean his saying at one point that Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization; and in fact Hezbollah from what I understand, like Hamaas, has social service wings. They also kill people, but it’s a valid comment. And you know, but they’re allowed to sit there like the wacky relative that just has to be suffered through.

Recorded on: 2/14/08



Mo Rocca: Are fringe candid...

Newsletter: Share: