What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Question: How would you structure a PR campaign for science?

Matthew Nisbet:  Well, I mean I think that the first general rule is that facts don't speak for themselves.  Simply transmitting or translating the facts of science is not necessarily going to win over the public or open up understanding among different segments of the public.  Often times you have to take a complex uncertain issue such as climate change and translate it in a way that connects to something that the public already understands or connects to something they already value.  So, a great example would be E.O. Wilson wrote this terrific book called "The Creation" and in the book he writes it as a open letter to a Southern Baptist Minister and he says "I'm an atheist, you're a Southern Baptist, we might disagree in terms of where life came from, but we both share this common value in the creation."  And he uses that presentation, that message as a way to kind of grow the audience for science, introduce a popular science book about environmental conservation to a religious audience who might not otherwise read a book like that.  And in the article for "The Scientist" and in the talks that we give, you know, one of our central themes is that scientists themselves and scientific institutions need to take more of a scientific approach to thinking about communication.  If they're going to be successful in reaching out to that broader audience, they first have to understand their audience and they first have to understand the media system that's going to translate their message and carry their message.  And that takes research, that takes the application of a lot of research in social science, but actually going out and doing the research, the focus groups, the surveys, to figure out the best way to frame your message in a way that's consistent with the science but resonates with that hard to reach non traditional public that you are trying to communicate with.

 

Matthew Nisbet On Public Re...

Newsletter: Share: