What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Matthew Nisbet:  Well, I think Barack Obama, what he does so well is that he translates compassion and empathy and emotion.  Positive emotion is what Barack Obama does so well.  He inspires, he motivates, in some ways he's—- you know, watching Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama on the primary trail, you saw two heavy weights really going at it in terms of campaign heavy weights and also a campaign team.  Both of them were excellent communicators with excellent strategies.  They needed to go in different directions based on their natural attributes.  In some ways Barack Obama stole the theme of Bill Clinton in 1992, change and hope.  And without that theme, Hilary Clinton had to go in a different direction about experience and really focusing on some of the types of fear appeals that Republicans have used so well in the past.  But if you notice just like in a science debate, what the media was covering and what the public was most interested in was not in the complexity of the policy issues or the policy differences between these two candidates.  It boiled down to information shortcuts and heuristics about character, experience, race, gender, religion and most of the strategic messaging and communication were around those attributes and appealing to those heuristics.

Question: What can we learn from the Monica Lewinsky scandal?

Matthew Nisbet:  Well, first you have to- you have to be transparent with all the information.  Don't be slow in producing the information, get it all out there.  Why?  Because if you don't have all the information out there, the media is going to engage in a media frenzy.  He was caught in shading the truth and that became the story then and he probably would have been better off early on admitting that he had a "sexual relationship with that woman," instead of denying it.

 

Matthew Nisbet On Barack Ob...

Newsletter: Share: