What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: What is the interplay between art and science in your work?

Jepsen:  Art is about technology too.  I mean the great artists were technical over history.  Leonardo or, boy, whatever you think of, Ansel Adams was also a chemical engineer and I just did art because I thought honestly the electrical engineering curriculum, my parents were helping pay for college and they wanted me to get a degree in electrical engineering and I thought it would have suppressed-- it was suppressing every ounce of creativity I might have had and I’m not really saying I had much, but I sort of did art just for therapy because I think that in the early years in science or perhaps particularly in engineering education it’s quite a grind.  It’s really boring and I just remember like these incline planes.  I grew up on a farm and you’re supposed to study like how a box slid down an inclined plane with a certain friction and I just thought I’ve never seen a box slide down straight and the friction.  It always falls off the inclined plane in a different way.  Why doesn’t this model that?  And I was so frustrated with the way my experience was of the engineering curriculum.  I took the art and really it’s because I fell and I made my first hologram when I was a kid and wanted to understand about it from all sides.  But artist say-- it’s funny because I spent a lot of time in the art world after that. Artists say engineers solve problems other people give them to solve and artists say they solve their own problem.  They call engineers technicians and they include like MIT professors as technicians and I kept saying well “Don’t call an MIT professor a technician unless you intend to insult that person” but whatever.  It’s just different languages.  There’s a lot of the freedom in art combining with the techniques and skills that you learn in engineering that you can combine and I think that it makes a lot of sense to combine them.  A lot of people, especially young in college in the early years that are practicing art often don’t have much technical skill and they keep saying, “Well, we can’t have that because then it’ll delude my vision and I can’t do it.”  No, you can actually learn how to do it and then you’ll have a more informed vision.  So I sort of disagree but there’s a study, there was a study about artists showing-- some of the conceptual artists do their great work when they’re young and a lot of the artists that were more about technique, Cezanne for example did his best work when he was older and that there’s sort of the experimentalist versus the conceptual sort of, wow, a totally way to look at the world where the technique actually isn’t important.  It’s perhaps in fitting with that.  I wish I could remember.  There’s a book on it.  I can send you a link.  I can look it up.


Mary Lou Jepsen On The Scie...

Newsletter: Share: