What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Topic: The Supreme Court: 1937-1987

Laurence Tribe: Well I think there was a phase in American life – lasted probably from about 1937 to 1987 – when the better angels of our nature expressed through the more aspirational provisions of our Constitution were somewhat aligned with the trajectory of judicial appointment; sometimes almost by accident when someone like Brennan is put on the Supreme Court by Eisenhower.  It was because he was a Catholic from the northeast and that’s what Eisenhower wanted.  It wasn’t because Eisenhower wanted a liberal architect of jurisprudence. When Eisenhower put Warren on the Court, it wasn’t because he wanted someone who would sort of gather the court together and with his almost central casting presence as Chief Justice manage to move the court in the direction of greater fairness.  It’s that he wanted … wanted, you know, this great republican from California out of the way in national politics.  And he thought a good place to put him would be in the Chief Justice’s seat.  So there were some accidents.  The only deliberate appointment of someone who was understood to be a liberal, and appointed partly for that reason, was L.B.J.’s appointment of Thurgood Marshall, probably the greatest lawyer of the 20th century to be a justice of the Supreme Court.  So for reasons partly accidental, partly intentional, the Court occupied a place where it could make a significant difference in terms of reading the Constitution in a way that I think reflected the best instincts of those who wrote and ratified it.  And I do believe that even though some of them were slave owners, that they had some good instincts.  And that the Civil War transformed the Constitution in dramatic ways; making it a document which, rightly read, is genuinely progressive.  Now that era is over.


Laurence Tribe on Supreme C...

Newsletter: Share: