What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Question: Who is overrated?

Jonathan Franzen: I always felt E.M. Forster was overrated frankly, to take an obvious example. Never really got it.

When people go on and on about Graham Green, especially his important books like “End of the Affair,” I get puzzled. But I shouldn’t be.

There’s nothing wrong with Green and there’s nothing wrong with Forster either, I just feel like, what’s all the fuss about?

Question: What is all the fuss about?

Jonathan Franzen: Damned if I know frankly.

I think there must be American writers, Dave Wallace [David Foster Wallace], I think is one of them, and probably George Saunders is another, who I don’t think the Brits get at all.  I think they’re just like, this is so puerile, it’s so easy, I don’t know what they’re thinking, or this is so bratty, it’s so annoying, or it’s so broad or whatever they’re saying.

I think there’s a category of American fiction that just doesn’t cross the ocean [North Atlantic Ocean] so well. And I think that I’m talking about a not inconsiderable strain of British fiction writing, to some people, this is what a novel is, it’s an E.M. Forrester novel or a Graham Green novel. They’re living practitioners in England producing novels that also today seem like, well, this is what a real novelist is and this is what a real novel is. And for some of us in America, you just say, “That’s not even a novelist hardly, that’s sort of a near perfect replica of a novel." So it’s a taste thing.

I think there’s a kind of well made product that Forster pioneered and represents that engendered a great many very well made novels in England in the 20th century that you either think is like what a novel should be, or else you just throw up your hands.

Recorded On: April 1, 2008

 

Jonathan Franzen on Overrat...

Newsletter: Share: