What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Bruce Bueno de Mesquita: We might ask rhetorically, whose taxes does President Obama want to increase.  The standard journalistic response is the rich.  My preferred response if republicans.  The republican voters are disproportionately wealthy and he wants to tax republicans to reward democrats. They want to cut spending in order to reduce the deficit and where would they like to reduce spending entitlements?  Who disproportionately benefits from entitlements?  The relatively poor who disproportionately vote democrat.  The republicans want to punish the democrats to reward their constituents.  The democrats want to punish the republicans to reward theirs.  

 How might we fix this?  Well it would be nice for example if we the people elected the congress instead of the members of congress choosing who their voters will be.  Gerrymandering insures that the congress gets to pick its voters rather than the other way around.  So the probability of being reelected as an incumbent in the congress is 95%, almost as high as it was in the old Soviet Union of being reelected to their parliament.  We have a rigged system.  We could fix that.  There are lots of excellent political science studies on how to design redistricting so that it’s completely nonpartisan.  It’s entirely one person, one vote subject to geographic constraints and topology.  We could write computer programs that do redistricting.  

Now no member of congress is going to agree to that in the short term because that would put her or his hold on power at risk, but if we were to pass a law that says starting in 20 years or 25 years this program will be used to do redistricting we would have solved the problem of the voters not choosing their members of congress and that would go a long way to altering the risk of being thrown out of office if you don’t do what the people want and we would get much better policy, but that is very far down the road.  Shorter term, also hard to do.  We could get rid of the Electoral College.  It’s useful to remember that when people speak about standing by the original constitution and so forth, being strict constitutionalists, the Electoral College was designed as a slavery institution.  We got rid of slavery.  We haven’t gotten rid of this slavery institution.  We ought to.  That too would insure that presidents would be more responsive to a still larger coalition and that would mean doing more of what we the people want.

Directed / Produced by

Jonathan Fowler and Elizabeth Rodd

 

 

How to Stay in Office: Sele...

Newsletter: Share: