What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: How does a board go about selecting a CEO?

Bill George:  It starts with the mission of the company. Does the leadership of the company are they committed to the mission and the values of the company?  Goldman Sachs for instance, John Wraith had written the mission and values of the company in the early 1980s, 25 years ago, and he wrote about the client’s interest always come first.  Is the leadership committed to that proposition?  We believe in teamwork over stars.  Is the leadership committed to that?  Don’t choose a leader who is not, who wants a start system.  If you believe in creating meritocracy, which Goldman is, which Medtronic is, which Exxon Mobil where I serve on the board is then you better choose someone believes in meritocracy and not pushing up a lot of his political buddies and playing a power game and that’s what you’ll see in a lot of  these failed leaders.  They’re more interested in personal power accumulation and their own personal self aggrandizement.  And by the way, I don’t even think it was money.  I think the money conveyed a certain status that they were looking for and it was a way of offsetting some internal feelings that weren’t so good and so I think we’ve chosen the wrong leaders for the wrong reason.  I mean choosing people based on their charisma instead of their character.  When choosing people based on their image instead of their integrity.  choosing people more for style and substance.  If you choose people for that, why are you surprised when don’t get people of great character and great values?  And so I think boards have failed in many, many cases.  Now the corporate boards are finally waking up and I hope the Wall Street boards are going to wake up.  The Citigroup board was totally asleep when it didn’t manage Sandy Weill and let him create the kind of instability he did and then chose Chuck Prince the lawyer to take over.

Question: Is that an argument against “too big to fail?”

Bill George:  Yes, I don’t believe in the big bank supermarket.  I don’t think you can argue its absolute size.  Like take Exxon.  It’s the world’s largest company.  I don’t think you can say Exxon is too big, let’s break it up.  Exxon is focusing on what it does well, oil and gas, okay.  Delivering it in the most efficient way to the most people and you know and doing it with the least amount of energy usage.  It’s very committed to that.  And Goldman Sachs is focused on being an investment bank.  You know I’m not even sure.  I think you can’t put the genie back in the bottle, but I’m not so confident that was a good thing.  Dick Covosovich, a very successful CEO of Wells Fargo for 20 years, the most successful commercial bank.  He would never again do investment banking.  He was going to stay the course and I talked to him about Wachovia.  Why did he do Wachovia because he took a huge hit from some of their trading activities?  He said, “We wanted it for the franchise.”  And that’s what they’ll get.  You watch.  They’ll have that east of the Mississippi franchise with the west of the Mississippi.  They’re be a great commercial bank is what they’ll be, but they understand their mission.  They didn’t try to be all things to all people and I think that was the failing of Sandy Weill at Citigroup.

Recorded on October 9, 2009


How to Recruit the Right CEO

Newsletter: Share: