What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Jim Lehrer: Well it all goes back to when I was a kid. When I made the decision when I was a sophomore in high school, the decision was to be a writer. And I have been writing fiction since I was a teenager.

You know, short stories and stuff like that. None of them . . . none of them were very good. None of them deserved to ever be published. But what it . . . what happened to me was . . . And I’m so fortunate. The worst thing you can do is be around somebody who’s fortunate and doesn’t know it or won’t admit it. You are not . . . That’s not the case here, okay? I’m fortunate and I know it. But I . . . I . . . I decided that I wanted to do both, and I decided that early. In other words I wanted to be a journalist and I wanted to be a reporter.

But I also wanted to go into my imagination. I wanted to write stories – made up stories. And I got very much into Hemingway. I was a Hemingway-generation person.

Hemingway said, “You wanna be a writer? Get a job on a newspaper. It will force you to deal with the English language every day in some semi-coherent way. Keep food on the table. And if you really pay attention, you’ll meet all kinds of people that can later be characters in your novels or whatever fiction you’re writing. And most importantly you will be confronted with all kinds of human dilemmas in journalism that you can later use automatically when you come to write fiction."

And that’s certainly what’s happened to me.

I’ve had these parallel things.

I write a little bit on my fiction every day. It’s just what I do. Yes I have my day job. I do that too; but I do both things every day. And I have for years.

I don’t get up in the morning and say, “Am I gonna write today?” The only thing I think about is what I am going to write, not if I’m going to write.

I think probably what’s happened to me – and it’s glorious, and I’m so lucky to be able to do this – is that by writing fiction, I am free to let my imagination go.

As a consequence, because I have the fiction, nobody should ever have to watch the NewsHour and say, “Who is Jim Lehrer? And what’s he really like? And what is his. . .”--you know?

I don’t want people thinking about that. I want them to pay attention to what I’m saying. And not who I am or what my views are. “Is he really sad,” or “Is he really happy,” or any of that sort of stuff.

And to keep my personality – my “persona” is probably a better way of putting it – away from what my purpose is, which is to present the news. And I think I’m freer to do that because I have my fiction.

It's an unlikely event that somebody’s interested and looking into the deep recesses of my mind and soul about some of my fundamental beliefs about human nature or whatever, read my fiction. Don’t watch the NewsHour. And I’m lucky to have those two things.

 

Recorded: July 4, 2007.

 

 

How do you write?

Newsletter: Share: