What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Edward Crane:  Well, I think eventually, when you have ideological forces that are strong, that are frustrated, that they will out in the long run.  It is a serious problem, the entrenchment of these two parties.  But you have 16 percent support for Congress today and 24 percent for the Republican president.  I mean, there’s a lot of dissatisfaction, and eventually something will give.  I’m convinced that if you got rid of contribution limits that you would have these two new parties.  And it’s interesting, because my friend Gene McCarthy, who passed away a couple of years ago, used to say, had the 1974 amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act been in place in 1968 when he challenged Lyndon Johnson in his own party, he would not have run.  I mean, Gene McCarthy got $100,000, six figure contributions from Stewart Mott and other wealthy liberals that allowed him to challenge Johnson and in fact, knock out a sitting president from his own party.  Gene didn’t get the nomination, but he wouldn’t have run, he said, had those $1,000 limits, which came out of the ’74 amendment, been in place then.  So I think these limits on contributions-- as long as you have full disclosure, which I’m perfectly willing to give up, even though philosophically I don’t think you should have to disclose, but okay.  I think there would market pressure to disclose.  I think people would say, “Well, where’d you get your money?”  And if you can say, “I got my money from these people because they believe what I believe, and that’s how we’re going to run this campaign,” that would be fine.  And then you’d be able to challenge the incumbents, but the way it is now, it’s almost impossible.

More from the Big Idea for Wednesday, October 10 2012

Today's Big Idea: Open-Source Government

The Arab Spring and Wikileaks are early indications of the possibility of a technology-driven politics that is more responsive to citizens' needs. It's axiomatic that once in power, leaders will d... Read More…

 

Edward Crane Critiques the ...

Newsletter: Share: