What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: Did the World Economic Forum serve as a bellweather for the global financial turn down?

Kevin Steinberg: We ran a simulation about three years ago in Davos where we had a number of global investment professionals talk about how allocating money to different sectors in particular may be a good demonstration of where the economy was going over that particular year. And it was an interactive exercise where different teams were thinking about the allocation process and thinking about what the implications might be for M & A and other activity. As part of that particular exercise, before we wrapped up, we gave people an extra option that we didn’t announce before, which was instead of putting their investments into particular industries, they could instead put it in a safe bank, in a treasury so to speak, or what we called under the mattress. It turned out after we finished that exercise that 30 percent or 35 percent of the overall allocation went to the mattress. And it was a very, very interesting example.

Before we actually had everybody put up their results, there was a more lighthearted
element or more lighthearted aspect to the room where people thought what industry will it be, how will things compare. However, once we actually put up the results and people realized that by far the dominant investment was putting money under the mattress, it dawned on the collective group that actually there were very significant implications for that. Because if money collectively in the system was not going to be put to work, we ran the risk of a real slow down in the global economy as business, as government and as others looked at a potential slow down with everybody sitting on the sidelines and, therefore, having a spiral that would reinforce part of the problem.

That in turn led us to looking at what was taking place the following year and unfortunately it's part of what actually occurred. If you looked at what happened in the following year, the global economy slowed down considerably in part because of an incredible investor hesitation to put money to work in different ways. And I thought it was an interesting story where sometimes the discussions at Davos that even seem lighthearted at first can be indicative of a broader dynamic. Can be indicative of the fact that there are serious issues at foot and with the benefit of hindsight I wish there was more we could have done to work with not only that group but some other players in the global economy to talk about how that hesitation to be active could put money on the sidelines and potentially exacerbate a difficult conversation.


Did Davos Fail to Anticipat...

Newsletter: Share: