What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: How did you feel when Fischer defaulted on his world title?

Anatoly Karpov: So I wasn’t very happy that Fischer didn’t appear for the match and I made many efforts to play another match.  Okay, even it could be not official match for world title, but I wanted to play Fischer and I met him for several times, but I believe he had psychological problems at that moment.  And so first of all he couldn’t accept to lose even one game.  And so you could feel it when we had discussions.  He thought that when he became world champion he had no right to make one mistake or especially to lose chess game. And with such approach it is very difficult to play chess because when you meet a player who is on the same level and very strong, you can’t avoid losing game.  Even one game.  You can win a match, but not playing without losing the game. It’s almost impossible. 
Did you ever meet Fischer?

Anatoly Karpov: Yes I met Fischer a couple of times and the first time, I mean in this set because we met first in San Antonio in 1972 just after he became world champion, after he beat Spasky in Reykjavik.  I played in San Antonio in 1972 and then Fischer was invited by organizers.  He was guest of honor now for the closing ceremony and the final round.  That time I met him for the first time and then we had set of meetings in 1976 and 1977.  And so 1977, it was last time and we met here in the United States.  It was in Washington D.C.

What did you think of Fischer as a person?

Anatoly Karpov: I must say that we had full respect of each other and so it was nice to talk to him.  And what I could realize, he had no patience to listen to his partner or opponent, and if he could find out any ideas, he should express this immediately even he could interrupt the other person.  He couldn’t wait.  He was very impulsive in this way.  But I have good memory of these meetings and I must say I had not any problems to contact him and to talk to him.

Do you think Fischer was crazy?

Anatoly Karpov: Well Fischer was always thinking that he belongs to planet and he’s not a member, or citizen of one country or another and he thought, okay, of course he was great star and also great player, one of the greats in the history of chess, so he considered that he belongs to the planet. And then he was very independent and so he expressed these feelings, sometimes with very sharp sentences which I would not support, but this was his character.

Wasn’t Paul Morphy, the only other American to become world champion, also crazy?

[0 0:29:01.00] Paul Morphy had another story and so he got mad because he wasn’t well accepted.  If we recall the history of Paul Morphy, he made fantastic tour through Europe and he beat the strongest players of that time, the strongest part of the world in chess. He beat Europeans and he became unofficial world champion.  But then he came back to the United States and it was time of the problems between North and South, and it was Civil War and then Morphy was well accepted, accepted with triumph in lots of United States but then he came back to his area, and he was from South, so people there didn’t appreciate his victories.  And so it created a lot of personal problems and he ended his life I think in the hospital.

Do you have to be crazy to play great chess?

Anatoly Karpov: No.  Absolutely not.

Recorded on May 17, 2010
Interviewed by Paul Hoffman


Close Encounters With Bobby...

Newsletter: Share: