What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Bill Richardson: Yes, but President Bush has waited seven years, and it may be too late. But it’s good to get people together in a room. I’ve always believed that you gotta negotiate your differences. Finally they invited Syria to participate, but much too late. I would have been talking to Syria earlier. But what is important is to realize that resolving the Israeli-Palestinian issue or making it less tense helps us try to deal with Iran, with the Iraq war. And what I believe is healthy is that if we can establish certain principles in the Middle East peace negotiations, like preserving Israel’s security; along with creating a Palestinian state; and then dealing with the outlines of the 67 borders; and then dealing also with the Jerusalem situation with the status of Palestinian refugees, but at the same time providing Israel a sense of security that it won’t be attacked, and that America will stand with our traditional relationship with it; and then you couple that with an effort by the United States to connect again with the Islamic world with many countries that are moderate Arabs, that are not jihadist terrorists. Because what we do need to do in our foreign policy is build international support against international terrorism, against those jihadists that do want to harm. My intensity in trying to bring a solution. My worry is in the Annapolis Conference that the President and Secretary Rice have said okay, these are the outlines, so you guys work it out. It’s not gonna happen unless America plays the role of honest broker; pushes both sides; builds coalitions; brings Syria in; brings Iran in; tries to resolve the Iraq war. But just getting back to the Israeli-Palestinian issue, the Annapolis Conference . . . my worry is that President Bush is gonna say okay, I’ve outlined the basis for peace. We’ve said that we’re gonna have a conclusion by 2008, and you guys are on your own. I would personally engage. I would spend my personal time. If I were President Bush, I would have been in Annapolis every second to try to find ways not just to produce a document that says our goal is to create peace, but to start looking at the potential outlines, ‘cause I believe there’s some potential areas of agreement there that if we can at least secure them early, you’re moving in the right direction and you’re lessening the tension. And you’re isolating the Hamaases and the terrorist elements that exist in the Middle East today.

Recorded on: 11/20/07

 

 

Bill Richardson: If you wer...

Newsletter: Share: