Asymmetrical Relationships | Randy Cohen

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Transcript

Randy Cohen: You know, many people think all genuinely loving relationships are asymmetrical. One person loves more than the other. And that may very well be true. I believe that to be true. It’s less than ideal. But it’s often the case that two people love each other, but one person cares more. One person has more at stake emotionally. Does that make the relationship in some sense immoral? No, I don’t think so. There’s a duty to be honest, to treat another person’s heart with tenderness, but you can’t demand utter symmetry.

After that, the other person is, for all practical purposes, an adult. And he gets to decide if, given the nature of the relationship, he wants to participate in it. You know, even though Emmy Lou Harris never has me over for dinner, never returns my phone calls, and then there’s the damned court order. That I still think it’s a valuable relationship to continue, so I still listen to her music.

You know, all’s fair in love and war is one of 50 different bits of jargon that we use to justify the incredible selfishness that can often go along with love. But if it’s working really well, simply by pleasing yourself, you please the other person. You know, it’s an impossible golden dream that it’s at least something aspirational in your erotic life that you’re not doing things, you yourself hate simply as a favor to the other person. That in general, for the most part, by doing what you genuinely enjoy in bed, that gives a great deal of pleasure to the other person. I’m not utopian about this. There’s all sorts of things we do for one another as gifts, you know, sexual gifts, not things we despise, not things we detest, but things are… this isn’t my first choice of what we’d be doing now, but I do it because you like it. And there’s pleasure in pleasing the beloved.

So be generous spirited in bed and out of bed. Be generous spirited in your erotic life and in your heart. But the more, simply by being yourself you give pleasure to the other person, the greater the odds of you’re having a happy sex life and a happy emotional life.