THE WORLD
Re: What is ethical globalization?
  • Currently 1.8
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2

(5)
Mary Robinson
Uploaded on 11/28/2007

Description: Linking human rights values to the current global economic system is crucial to Robinson.

Transcript: When I finished my five years term as UN High Commissioner, I wanted to bring, again, that experience into linking the human rights values and the reality of economic globalization, which is so unfair and divides the world. I was influenced by Professor Hans ________, who has developed a global ethic. And he draws on the great religions of the world and sees how much they have in common as a global ethic. And I felt that similarly, the commitment to human rights should have a bearing on what happens in globalization. So we’ve been looking at trade issues, and here I wear another useful hat. I’m the Honorary President of Oxfam International. So we work with Oxfam. And I attended Cancun . . . the discussions there on trade. I was in Hong Kong for the most recent discussions. There is, on paper, a commitment to a ________ development ground which should mean fairer trade, but it’s not happening. And the rich countries continued their subsidies on agricultural goods. That’s a human rights issue. But I went to Maui with a delegation and we went out into the field. It was the women who were picking the cotton. They were poorer than they had been three or four years before because of the subsidies in the United States boosting ________ business in cotton and depressing the prices for these poor women in West Africa who have lovely cotton, but they can’t compete with the subsidies. So I saw the same thing in Mozambique with sugar, which is an EU issue . . . the European Union. So we try to frame trade issues in terms of the impact on human rights. We try to engage the private sector . . . major corporations that human rights is not just the responsibility of governments, but companies have an appropriate responsibility. We do a lot of work in that area. I mentioned already I work in health, because health is not just very important to the individual and family. A health crisis – a sick child, a dying father – can be a huge problem driving a family back into an acute poverty. So it’s very linked to family development, and also a country’s development. A country’s health system is key to whether that country will do well economically. And these are issues that engage us mostly in partnering with others and in bringing our strong human rights lens and our insistence. If you take a human rights approach, you must feel comfortable. You must think of those who are most vulnerable. You must have a gender perspective, and you must tackle corruption. So these are the kind of ways in which we show a human rights approach, and it makes a difference.

Recorded on: 7/25/07

4
5
5
Responses
SORT BY
Re: What is ethical globalization?

Ethics of globalization is often a concern in global economics which confuse many who are unfamiliar with it -ethical globalization necessitates an appreciation of the definition and the effects of economic globalisation -I think this prize winning high school essay on globalisation may be useful...  http://www.geocities.com/anil.ari_global

 

 

0
0
Re: Re: What is ethical globalization?
As Muhammad Yunus says in his interview. "Poverty is the absence of human rights." In turn, "ethical globalization" should be globalization with the absence of poverty. We can either preserve the continued system of exploitation, or fix it in the beginning. We're still at the relative infancy of the global age. Fix it now before we drive ourselves into a hole.
1
0
Re: Re: What is ethical globalization?
Ethical globalization would give consumers the opportunity to weigh in their "dollar vote" as part of the process. I think governments and corporations need to stop making decisions about the fate of third world people above the heads of constituents and consumers. If my buying will impact people in Africa, I should be permitted to make an informed choice regarding the production of goods.
5
0
Another way to subvert corporate globalization
Mary Robinson provides a good, short explanation of how corporate globalization is destroying the livelihoods of communities and individuals. However, she doesn't tell us much about solutions to these problems. Robinson seems to want to rely on governments and corporations to fix a problem that they've created. I'm pretty pessimistic about the willingness of either group to hear concerns about poverty, pollution, and other problems that stem from corporate globalization. I'm not suggesting we quit pressuring these groups, but there are other things we can do that make an impact right now. We can examine our own patterns of consumption. Where were our clothes made? Where did our last meal come from? If we're relying on big corporations for basic needs, it's likely that someone was exploited for ultra-cheap labour to make our stuff, and it's likely that a ton of pollution was created by the decentralized production network that corporations rely on to produce goods. We can create alternatives to this: buy used clothing, set up clothing swaps with friends, start growing our own food, buy from local farmers. These practices challenge corporate globalization DIRECTLY, by setting up new ways to get what we need. They also avoid the negative environmental impacts of corporate consumption. They won't fix the problems over night, but they chip away at them. They also remind us that we don't NEED corporations as much as we might think, which is important in itself. A final note: this retreat from global consumption doesn't mean a retreat from all aspects of globalization. In fact, a lot of groups are using the tools of globalization (especially the internet) to share the alternatives they're working on with other like-minded individuals.
4
0
Re: Re: What is ethical globalization?
Before I choose to disagree, I would like to understand the topic better. From what I can currently see, though, it makes no sense to me. Why should I have to pay more for local goods just so someone across the world can make more on their version of the same product? How is it that it becomes a human rights issue? I can only assume I have misunderstood, because it appears like you would stomp on my rights in order to give someone else rights that it doesn't look like they deserve. If they can't make money with the product they have, they must produce something else. This is no different than anyone else has to do. If they need help getting into a new industry, then I can certainly get behind that. Such a thing benefits them as well as everyone else.
4
1
PAGE
1