What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Deconstructing the Health Care Debate

December 4, 2009, 3:00 AM

With the American health care debate in full force, Big Think thought it an opportune time to put together a package on the subject. Today we roll out two interviews with experts on the industry: Yale political science professor Jacob Hacker, whose 2007 proposal "Healthcare for America" launched the public option to national prominence, and George Halvorson, CEO of Kaiser Permanente and author of the new book, “Health Care Will Not Reform Itself: A User’s Guide to Refocusing and Reforming American Health Care.” In addition, we recently polled some of the industry’s recognized thought leaders to ascertain their vision of the ideal medical plan. Should the U.S. have one single system, or should we piece together a patchwork of systems? Should we embrace a public health care option? Interesting insights that came out of the survey are highlighted after the jump.

Jacob Hacker offers his opinion of the bill just passed by the House of Representatives and predicts its ultimate fate. He assesses the Democrats' performance on the health care issue more generally, expressing satisfaction—but not surprise—at how much traction it's gained this year. Finally, he offers a few words of advice for ordinary citizens who feel like helpless spectators amid the Washington bickering—even as their coverage depends on its outcome.

George Halvorson discusses the necessity of an information technology revolution. Kaiser Permanente’s transformation to electronic medical records has resulted in serious health benefits for patients. “We created care plans for all the patients with heart conditions and made sure that we delivered on the care plan so that it was a team of primary care doctor, cardiologist, pharmacists, nurses, receptionist -- I mean a full care team relating to the patient, with care plans for each patient that we tracked through the computer, supported through the computer, and reminded people of the next thing to do through the computer.  And we cut the death rate from both major forms of heart disease by 73 percent in two years.”


*Our experts were split down the middle as to whether they wanted to see a new public plan created that provides coverage for a comprehensive set of benefits.

*They had some other ideas for how public programs should be amended:

     -The government should assure provision of mandatory, national-pool   catastrophic insurance for all.

     -Less fortunate people should be allowed to participate in the system through direct aid.

     -Medicare should be expanded to cover more of the chronically uninsured or uninsurable, but reimbursement to providers must be at an appropriate level.

*In terms of cost containment, our experts favored two ideas:

     -Simplify health insurance administration by adopting standards for transactions, including timely and transparent claims and denial management processes and use of standard electronic transactions.

     -Require insurers to adopt uniform billing and claims forms.

*They had some other innovative ideas for cost containment:

     - A “base-cutting” model: set up an independent expert Board to recommend quality best practices and control prices.

     - Cap profits of insurers.

     -Self-referral and ownership of hospitals, outpatient surgery centers and other "self--referral" entities should be prohibited. -Corporate practice of medicine laws that prohibit hospitals from employing physicians should be eliminated.

     -Create instate value based purchasing to reward quality and utilization rather than inventing volume.

*When it came to quality control—how can we raise the standard of care?—our experts favored two proposals:

     -Encourage states to develop alternatives to the current civil litigation system as a way to improve patient safety, reduce medical errors, increase the availability of a prompt and fair resolution of disputes, and improve access to liability insurance, while preserving an individual’s right to seek redress in court.

     -Provide grants for improving health system efficiency, including grants to establish community health teams to support a medical home model, medication management services, regional emergency care and trauma systems.


Deconstructing the Health C...

Newsletter: Share: