What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

End of History 101

May 18, 2011, 10:08 AM
Peter2

So one of our BIG THINKERS, Daniel Honan, gave us a fine introduction to one of the biggest ideas around, THE END OF HISTORY.

Daniel is right that the idea is much more plausible than it seems at first.  He's also right that it originates with the German philosopher Hegel.  So it is also found in Hegelians such as Karl Marx--who thought that communism would be the end of history.  The best of the Hegelians, though, is Alexandre Kojeve, who thought the end of history is already here.  Francis Fukuyama,  following Kojeve in part, also thought the end of history is already here. 

You can read a lot more on Kojeve and Fukuyama in my Postmodernism Rightly Understood.

It'll take a number of posts to convince you skeptics about the plausibility of this big idea.  Let me bgin at the beginning:  What is History?

For Kojeve (and Marx), there are two realities--NATURE and HISTORY.  One can't be explained in terms of the other.  Marx, among the Hegelians, says most clearly that at History's end man has MASTERED nature or made it his own.  Natural scarcity, for that reason, disappears.  In this respect, Marx can't be considered, of course, an anti-captialist;  it was the amazing productivity of capitalism--that Historical work to make nature our own--that eradicated scarcity.  Kojeve says at the end of History man becomes a merely natural being--or just like the other animals--again.  His satisfaction of his distinctively Historical desires cause his desire to return to  a natural (can we say Darwinian?) level again.  If distinctively HUMAN (or free) reality is Historical, it makes sense to say it would be temporary (or havie a beginning and end).

HISTORY is distinctively human reality--the record of human freedom from nature.  We make ourselves free over time, as the beings with time in us.  We NEGATE nature to provide evidence of our freedom.  The first historical act, for Kojeve (Hegel) is the fight to the death for pure prestige--to show our freedom from being determined by the instinct of self-preservation.  Our deepest Historical desire is to be free and to be recognized in our freedom.

HISTORY, to make a long story short, is driven by the COSMIC ACCIDENT that is man.  There's no natural explanation for the emergence of the free human being. But the HISTORICAL being is not only a free but a rational being.  So history has a LOGOS.  It reveals that LOGOS at its END--the recognition of the equal freedom of every human being.

So as Marx noticed in "On the Jewish Question," the POLITICAL end of history is THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION.  There religion or God has disappeared.  God, for Marx or Kojeve, is evidence of a defect or incompleteness in History.  God is a projection of illusory satisfaction in an imaginary other world.  He is no longer needed when we achieve HISTORICAL satisfaction. 

In the Constitution of 1787, all human beings are recognized, in principle, as free beings or citizens.  There are no distinctions based on race, class, gender, religion, etc.  It's true that the principle of the American Constitution didn't immediately transform American or global reality.  But still:  It was, in principle, the end of History.  And American history isn't really History, but merely the working out of the details of History's end.  That's also true of all of human History since the time of our revolutionary founding.

There's a lot more to say, including:  The end of History with "democratic capitalism" (established in principle by our Constitution) only makes sense if we are fundamentally political (or maybe economic) beings.

 

 

End of History 101

Newsletter: Share: