What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Bored on the Fourth of July

July 4, 2011, 3:22 PM
Peter2

Well, I'm really not.  But a lot of BIG THINKERS must be, because we have nary a post so far talking up THE AMERICAN HOLIDAY.  So HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY!

Today is the celebration not so much of independence (voted on July 2), but of the argument for it--THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.  

The Declaration is, of course, the argument for independence given by the united Americans against Britain.  And the argument is that the British government--but especially the KING--is tyrannizing over us, systematically and repeatedly violating our rights.  But the Declaration is also an agrument for the independence--for the equal freedom by nature--of every human person or creature or individual.  Our government(s) will claim SOVEREIGNTY by the consent of individuals who are sovereign by nature. 

So today we're celebrating by sharing our allegiance to truths we hold to be self-evident.  We are, as G.K. Chesterton wrote, "a nation with the soul of a church."  Churches are held together by common belief in particular dogmas.  We're held together by common belief in the principles set forth, Chesterton wrote, with "dogmatic lucidity" in the Declaration.

The not-so-silent Calvin Coolidge wrote that those principles are restful because they're final.  We believe that no progress can be made beyond them--just as we believe that our progress comes from more faithfully and consistently actng in accordance with them.  The Fourth of July, in that light, should be a day of rest for the same reason every Sunday should be.  We need to take a break from our incessant activity to remind ourselves of the foundation that makes our free and restless prosperity possible.

So we can criticize the authors and signers of the Declaration for not acting in full accordance with their principles.  Jefferson knew that all human beings--including those imported from Africa to be slaves--we're created equal and had inalienable rights.  But he didn't always act according to what he knew.

But we remember that it was the Abolitionists, from the very beginning, who talked up more than other Americans the stirring words of the Declaration as the foundation of their liberationist cause. So did our first strong proponents of the rights of women.  And the southern slaveholders ended up openly denying the Declaration's truth, saying that Jefferson didn't know what he was talking about.  It was in the context of the spilling of a huge amount of blood for a new birth of freedom that Lincoln rededicated us to the Declaration's proposition that all men are created equal.

Later, I will remind you that even on the level of principle our Declaration was a legislative compromise, with the result better than the theoretical intention of Jefferson the philosopher.  So I don't really think we should regard the principles of the Declaration as quite as restful or final as Biblical revelation--nor do I think our Founders would have wanted that.  But I won't go on on THE FOURTH OF JULY.

 

 

Bored on the Fourth of July

Newsletter: Share: