Recent Activity

Vid_1475_111x84

Richard Dudley commented on Are two parties enough? on January 8, 2008, 4:17 PM

The two party system severely limits options and creates polarization where little existed. A better option is to allow selection of first second and third choices. Such a system has been investigated, will allow the emergence of more parties, but still avoids the "no one got more than 50%" problem. This will allow better representation which can also avoid splitting votes for similar philosophies. - Richard

Vid_1475_111x84

Richard Dudley commented on Are two parties enough? on January 8, 2008, 11:17 AM

The two party system severely limits options and creates polarization where little existed. A better option is to allow selection of first second and third choices. Such a system has been investigated, will allow the emergence of more parties, but still avoids the "no one got more than 50%" problem. This will allow better representation which can also avoid splitting votes for similar philosophies. - Richard

Defaultblog-thumb

Richard Dudley commented on Re: Are two parties enough? on January 7, 2008, 1:49 PM

The two party system has a number of weaknesses. A different voting system is needed to make additional parties viable. One of these is a first, second, third choice system, where we would vote by ranking our choice of candidates. This avoids the big problem of third parties splitting support for a given philosophy (e.g. Nader and the Democratic Party). More later... Richard

More