What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Was Karl Rove Pulling Our Leg?

November 8, 2012, 10:08 AM

The Election Night spectacle on Fox News featuring an apparently unhinged Karl Rove taking on a roomful of data analyzers who had called the election for President Obama has me thinking that the whole thing might have been an elaborate stunt. First with a red sharpie and then with a barrage of figures that made anchor Megyn Kelly gasp (“Slow down! That’s too many numbers for me!”) Rove attempted to find a ray of light in every piece of bad Romney news the network was reporting.

To listen to the arguments coming out of Rove’s mouth, you had to think he was joking. But to look at his face, you would never think so. The purported political mastermind was unflappable and unfazed. He stirred doubt about the favorable Obama news out of Virginia and Ohio, drawing upon a magisterial command of precinct-by-precinct data and rough calculations of where as-yet-unreported votes for Romney might be lurking. Here is Jon Stewart’s uncommonly hilarious mockery of the “avalanche on Bullshit Mountain”:

If Rove is so smart and understands electoral politics as well as everyone says he does, how in the world could he flub this evening so badly?

One possibility is that Rove is less of a genius than we thought. Like Stephen Colbert’s parody of his right-wing pundit alter ego, Rove revealed himself as a man who mistrusts facts and puts all his faith in the wisdom of his gut.

Another possibility is that Rove really was on to something in pointing out discrepancies in the polls and maintaining the possibility that Romney had prevailed despite the projection of every major news source that Obama had won reelection. The “decision desk” guys were only “99.95 percent” confident in their Ohio projection, after all.

Or perhaps Rove’s genius was clouded by his massive investment in this election and that of the donors he courted who contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to support Romney’s bid to take the White House. On this view, the episode was a tidal wave of denial and wishful thinking.

But there is another explanation worth considering: maybe it was all a ruse, an elaborate plot to demonstrate  how misinformation presented animatedly and relentlessly by a presumed expert can stir doubt in the minds of intelligent observers. Rove was pulling an Alan Sokal-style hoax, demonstrating how a person with epistemic authority can say utterly ridiculous things and convince innocent news anchors  Megyn Kelly and Bret Baier  to take them seriously.  Watch Ms. Kelly’s awkward traipse over to the decision desk to run Rove’s wild claims by the Fox analysts who had called the election:

Intransigent, Rove kept fighting after Ms. Kelly returned to her anchor seat. But Fox never retracted its projection on Ohio or its “Obama Re-Elected” headline. In a contest with the facts, Karl Rove’s reputation and powers of persuasion met their match. Whether or not he meant to communicate this lesson, Rove’s performance on Tuesday night should give us renewed cause to stay on our epistemic guard. Ventures into postmodernland are not just for leftists anymore.

Follow Steven Mazie on Twitter: @stevenmazie


Was Karl Rove Pulling Our Leg?

Newsletter: Share: