What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Do Liberals Lie to Their Kids Less About Santa Claus?

December 25, 2012, 10:32 AM
Santa

It stands to reason that conservative parents would be more inclined to propagate the Santa myth, and not only because they tend to be more religious than liberals. Deception for noble motives has deep roots in conservative political philosophy. It was another era and a vastly different context, but consider Edmund Burke’s reactionary defense of illusion in 1790:

All the pleasing illusions, which made power gentle and obedience liberal, which harmonized the different shades of life, and which, by a bland assimilation, incorporated into politics the sentiments which beautify and soften private society, are to be dissolved by this new conquering empire of light and reason. All the decent drapery of life is to be rudely torn off. All the superadded ideas, furnished from the wardrobe of a moral imagination, which the heart owns, and the understanding ratifies, as necessary to cover the defects of our naked, shivering nature, and to raise it to dignity in our own estimation, are to be exploded as a ridiculous, absurd, and antiquated fashion.

We see the intellectual roots of today’s cry against the “War on Christmas” in Burke’s stalwart defense of “pleasing illusions” in the wake of the French Revolution, an event he loathed as much for its assault on the sentiments as for its attack on the ancien régime. Without supports for “the spirit of the gentleman” and “the spirit of religion,” Burke wrote, “we have no compass to govern us.” Illusion is the foundation of good government: “To make us love our country, our country ought to be lovely.”

This is exactly the defense of lying to one’s kids about Santa we find today. She’s no Burkean prose stylist, but consider Lindsay Cross’s case for deception at the Mommyish blog:

We lie to our kids. We do it for their own good. There’s a higher purpose involved, but let’s not pretend like we’re honest all the time, about everything. I happen to think that the wonder and excitement of Santa Claus, his reindeer, and his elves are worth the moral cost of lying. I think these stories teach children to imagine the impossible, to stretch their creativity. And honestly, I think they’re fun!

For the liberal response to all this noble lying, we could turn to the pop psychologists, or we could consult Thomas Paine, whose argued in his deliciously snotty response to Burke that governments should be supported by the light of reason, not ignorant belief in the “naturalness” of hierarchy:

On the contrary, Government, in a well-constituted republic, requires no belief from man beyond what his reason can give. He sees the rationale of the whole system, its origin and its operation; and as it is best supported when best understood, the human faculties act with boldness, and acquire, under this form of government, a gigantic manliness.

If you want to raise (wo)manly, clear-thinking, independent-minded children, Paine might advise, do not feed them lies about a benevolent man in a red suit. Tell them the truth about the provenance of their presents. Even if the man from the North Pole, by all appearances, is a Democrat.  

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Follow Steven Mazie on Twitter: @stevenmazie

 

 

 

 

Do Liberals Lie to Their Ki...

Newsletter: Share: