What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

The Next President’s Foreign Policy

October 16, 2012, 10:28 AM

In the run-up to their third and final debate on October 22nd, the theme of which is foreign policy, President Obama and Governor Romney will likely attempt to portray themselves as strong leaders who’re deeply committed to American exceptionalism and preeminence.  November 6th, however, shouldn’t be a referendum on which candidate is better suited to reversing the decline that America’s alleged to have suffered in recent years; instead, it should be seen as an opportunity to ask which one has a better grasp of how the global strategic balance is shifting.

Come January 20, 2013, the next president—whether a second-term Obama or a first-term Romney—will face a complex set of realities abroad, three of which merit special attention: (1) while the costs of and threats to sustaining U.S. leadership in the world are growing rapidly, there isn’t a credible alternative; (2) the impact of U.S. military power on geopolitics, while important, will continue to diminish; and, (3) largely because of social media, seemingly small, isolated incidents such as the self-immolation of a young fruit vendor or the posting of an amateurish YouTube video will be capable of rapidly, if not immediately, reshaping America’s relationships and priorities.

The next president must accordingly demonstrate creativity—to strengthen America’s ability to lead amidst an anemic economy at home and power shifts abroad—realism—about the limits to U.S. influence—and judiciousness—to ensure that America can respond to disturbances that go “viral” without losing sight of its vital national interests.  A foreign policy that embodies those virtues is more likely to cement an enduring leadership role for America in international affairs than a vague commitment to keeping it “number one” at all costs.

As for grading the next president’s foreign policy, Daniel Byman offers this important food for thought:

Americans like to think that all problems can be solved and that, if they aren’t, incompetence or malfeasance is to blame.  Often, however, the challenge is overwhelming and U.S. influence is limited.  The problem is not that Democrats are wimps, that Republicans are warmongers or that Washington’s halls of power are filled with the greedy and the hapless, but rather that few foreign policy problems can truly be solved.  Most can at best be managed, and just getting by is often the best we can do.  This should be the standard by which the foreign policy of the next administration is measured.

What standard(s) would you propose?

Follow Ali Wyne on Twitter and Facebook.

Photo Credit: Frontpage/Shutterstock.com


The Next President’s Foreig...

Newsletter: Share: