What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

The Phony Budget Drama

June 25, 2011, 2:57 PM
Eric_cantor_and_barack_obama_shake_hands2

Wednesday evening the bipartisan negotiations on raising the debt ceiling collapsed when House Majority Eric Cantor (R-VA) announced he was pulling out of the talks. Cantor refused to continue the talks as long as tax increases were on the table as a way to reduce the deficit, even though taxes in the U.S. are already low compared to other countries and by historical standards.

Just about all the major players agree that a deal should and will be made. In fact, Cantor’s walkout was planned well in advance as a way to force Obama to get involved in the negotiations. As John Dickerson explains, the breakdown in talks is simply a piece of staged political theater designed to demonstrate to the base of each party that their representatives are taking as hard a line in negotiations as possible. Failure to raise the debt ceiling before it isreached at the beginning of August would force the U.S. to default on its debt. That would make it difficult for the U.S. to continue borrowing money and dramatically weaken the U.S.’ economic position in the world. As Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner wrote in a letter to Congress earlier this year, even a temporary default could cause “catastrophic damage to the economy, potentially much more harmful than the effects of the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009.”

But why exactly are we even flirting with default? The conventional explanation is that the U.S. is facing a serious long-term budget problem. It’s true that the national debt is high and that the current levels of deficit spending are unsustainable in the long-term. As I have argued before, however, the problem is not that the U.S. can’t pay its debts, but that we don’t want to pay them. We refuse to cut either Medicare or military spending, but we won’t raise enough taxes to pay for those programs either.

In fact, according the Congressional Budget Office, if Congress just does nothing at all—which means letting the Bush tax cuts expire as they are currently scheduled to do—the budget deficit will disappear on its own by the middle of the decade. That doesn’t actually mean there is no budget issue at all, since doing nothing would also mean not passing another “doc fix” making sure Medicare is properly funded. But even if you take into account the money that we will need to spend on Medicare but haven’t yet budgeted, deficits would stilll shrink to around 2% of GDP—which is a sustainable level, as Josh Barro explains—if we allow the Bush tax cuts to expire. In other words, if we were simply willing to pay as much in taxes as we did during the Clinton administration, the budget crisis would essentially disappear.

 

The Phony Budget Drama

Newsletter: Share: