What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Joe Stack's Homegrown Terrorism

February 19, 2010, 8:59 PM
800px-oklahoma_city_national_memorial_4827

Terrorism is not an ideology. What makes something a terrorist act is not the political cause that motivates it or the background of the people involved. Terrorism is a particular type of violence, in which random or symbolic targets are attacked to intimidate them. The aim is not to achieve strategic or military goals directly, but to publicize a cause and put pressure on others to change their policies. Because it targets people who are at most peripherally involved in the conflict and may bear little responsibility for it, terrorism is almost universally condemned. Even those who strongly oppose our policies generally agree that blowing up civilians is the wrong way to attack us.

When Joe Stack flew his single-engine Piper Cherokee into an IRS building in Austin, it was an act of terrorism. It's not the superficial resemblance to the September 11 attacks that makes what Stack did terrorism. It's the fact that he makes clear in his angry suicide note that the attack was not aimed at the particular building he attacked but rather at our political system in general, and that he hoped that the attack would make people "wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are." Violence, he believed, was the only thing that could wake us up. "Nothing changes without a body count," he wrote.

But reporters and government officials have been reluctant to call what Stack did terrorism. On Fox, Catherine Herridge made a distinction between Stack's act and "Terrorism with a capital T." It's certainly fair to point out that Stack was not acting as part of a larger terrorist conspiracy. And one can make the case that in spite of his note that what Stack did was as much a burst of murderous insanity as a deliberate act of terrorism. Nevertheless, it was still explicitly an act of terrorism. Only its scale separates it from the Oklahoma City bombing.

If we're reluctant to call Stack's attack what it was, it's because "terrorism" has become a code word for what Muslim jihadists do. We don't apply the same standards to white Americans like Stack, whose frustration many Americans can more easily relate to. In the same way, many pro-life activists were unwilling to condemn Scott Roeder's assassination of Dr. George Tiller as an act of terrorism, even though Roeder targeted Tiller as part of his opposition to abortions. This double standard matters because, as Glenn Greenwald says, fear of terrorism has become a defining feature of political debate. Too often the claim that our enemies are terrorists is used to justify denying them even the most basic of human rights. The truth is that not all who oppose us are terrorists—whereas sometimes people who resemble us actually are.

 

Joe Stack's Homegrown Terro...

Newsletter: Share: