What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

A Moment of Silence

January 10, 2011, 4:12 PM
Us_navy_101207-n-5476h-300_the_national_ensign_flies_at_half-mast_during_a_ceremony_commemorating_the_69th_anniversary_of_the_dec._7__1941_japanese2

Saturday morning, Jared Lee Loughner opened fire outside a Tucson supermarket where Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) was meeting with constituents. Loughner shot at least 18 people, killing 6, including Gabe Zimmerman, one of Giffords’ staffers, John M. Roll, a federal judge who happened to be there at the time, and 9 year-old Christina Taylor Green, who came to the event with a neighbor. Giffords, who was shot in the head, remains in intensive care. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) tabled the House’s agenda for the week, putting off a planned vote on the repeal of health care reform. And President Obama asked the nation to observe a moment of silence today at 11:00 a.m.

When my friends asked me if I planned to write about the attack, my initial response was no. The attack was terrible and tragic, but didn’t seem to me to say much about our national politics. It's true that the fact that a member of Congress was targeted in the performance of her duties made it an attack not only on the community but on the state itself. Giffords received threats and had her office vandalized after supporting health care reform. But while a series of videos Loughner had posted on YouTube suggested that the attack was at least in some sense politically motivated, they also make it clear that Loughner was more deranged than following any coherent political agenda.

But it wasn’t long before people began to see the attack as more evidence for their own political views. Liberals and conservatives each saw in Loughner’s ravings evidence that he was carried out his attack in the name of their opponents’ agenda—never mind that Loughner lists among his favorite books The Communist Manifesto, Mein Kampf, and Animal Farm, which range across the entire spectrum of political ideas hardly add up to a coherent political philosophy. Some saw the atack as a sign that it was too easy for a mentally ill person to get a gun. David Frum somehow managed to blame the attack on Loughner’s use of pot. Others pointed out that the uncomfortable fact Giffords was one of the representatives targeted with crosshairs for her vote on health care on a map released by Sarah Palin before the midterm election (Palin now implausibly claims that what looked like crosshairs were just “surveyor’s marks”).

Gun control and drug policy are important issues, but it’s dangerous to read too much into a single tragedy. While I generally agree with Kris Broughton that conservative politicians sometimes cross a line in calling liberal politicians “domestic enemies”—and wish Palin wouldn’t using hunting metaphors when talking about American citizens—it isn’t fair to suggest that Republican rhetoric was in any way responsible for Loughner’s attack. As important as it is for us to have a conversation about all these issues, for a little while at least I wish we would observe that moment of silence.

 

A Moment of Silence

Newsletter: Share: