If you haven't looked into Ron Paul (the presidential candidate for 2008), please do before responding to this question.
His ideas are "crazy" according to the media and other candidates. He wants to remove the income tax (the federal reserve and the IRS), pull home ALL troops abroad and claims to be a constitutionalist.
He's raised millions and millions of dollars through online support and seems to be the only candidate who is truly running for big "change". Although it's the chosen slogan for his opponents.
So Ron Paul:
Is he what the country needs, a long shot, or a "nut"? How do his stances on issues either win or loose to his his opponent's views?
Discuss
Josh Friedman on February 3, 2008, 10:54 PM
From my response:
"I’ll say again that a Libertarian would be completely opposed to the government forcing a TV or radio station to give a candidate equal air time. Ron Paul himself would say that he has no positive right to equal air time, and that the station has the right, without intervention, to pursue their best profit by talking about only the candidates that will draw the most ratings. Any supporter of Ron Paul who complains about his media coverage does not understand what he stands for.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register