Nicholas Lemann: The common answer at this moment while I’m giving this interview is the Israel lobby, and that makes me intensely uncomfortable for, you know, a number of reasons I don’t have to go into. I guess the standard answer you would get is, you know, organized business lobby groups, because they have money, are . . . are disproportionately powerful. So that seems to me to be the strongest argument. To make the argument that a group that just essentially organizes very effectively around its point of view is “too powerful”, that makes me uncomfortable. I guess you could say groups that have access to unlimited financial resources and are able to make campaign contributions by advertisements and so on, they have a kind of thumb on the scales of politics, and they get more, you know, than they should. I’m not sure I believe that if that were true, you know, there would be a tweak to the system. I’m also not persuaded that campaign finance reform ever works, because it’s kind of like you cut it here and it pops up over there. That’s what we’ve seen in the last few rounds. There’s a lot of money that wants to find its way into politics and tends to find its way into politics. I mean in a certain way the most egregious example is small states are too powerful. You know Iowa and New Hampshire are too powerful relative to their population because they get to have two senators, and because they have these early presidential primaries. So their sort of special concerns get elevated over those of others.
Recorded on: 11/30/07
Discuss
Omar Sapayeen on February 6, 2008, 8:17 AM
You're a Dean of a school of Journalism, and you can't express yourself in words? Answering a direct question makes you 'uncomfortable'? Why bother answering the question?
Nobody doubts the power of lobbies, and AIPAC is the second largest/most powerful lobby in the US. There is no question as to whether it has influence.
AIPAC, the Israeli Lobby, has managed to get virtually every presidential candidate to stand on their stage and pledge their unconditional commitment to Israeli interests. The US consequently spends billions in aid to the country regardless of what doing so does to the image of the US worldwide. We're seen as working hand-in-hand in the displacement of Palestinians thanks to our policy.
Omar Sapayeen on February 6, 2008, 1:17 PM
You’re a Dean of a school of Journalism, and you can’t express yourself in words? Answering a direct question makes you ‘uncomfortable’? Why bother answering the question?
Nobody doubts the power of lobbies, and AIPAC is the second largest/most powerful lobby in the US. There is no question as to whether it has influence.
AIPAC, the Israeli Lobby, has managed to get virtually every presidential candidate to stand on their stage and pledge their unconditional commitment to Israeli interests. The US consequently spends billions in aid to the country regardless of what doing so does to the image of the US worldwide. We’re seen as working hand-in-hand in the displacement of Palestinians thanks to our policy.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register