Question: What are the forces that have shaped the United States most?
Ferguson: Well the United States is a fantastic idea with extraordinary resource ___________. It’s a wonderful combination of the right institutions, the right culture, the right place, the right time. And it’s really not surprising that the United States has been so astonishingly successful as an economy, as a society, and as an empire. We know it’s not surprising because it was predicated before 1776 by many commentators, including disinterested commentators like Adam Smith who understood just what the potential was of this place. But we may be living through the end of something. Not necessarily the end of the United States. On the contrary. I think the United States has a huge future ahead of it. But perhaps the end of the American empire. In a book called “Colossus”, I provocatively gave the subtitle “The Rise and Fall of the American Empire”, I made the argument that the United States is a very odd thing. It’s an empire in denial. It behaves like an empire. It does all the classic things that empires do like invading Afghanistan and Mesopotamia, and it wields tremendous military power. It exports its culture to foreign peoples. It does the full range of imperial things except for one. It doesn’t celebrate its own existence. It denies it. It insists that it’s not engaged in an empire. And the only people who say that it is are actually a relatively small marginal group of people on the left. So the question I asked was: (A) Was the American empire a bad thing? And my conclusion was no. On balance it was better than all the available alternatives. It was certainly better than the other empires on offer in the mid 20th century. But the second question was well how long can it last in its present form? And my suggestion was not very long, because as a force for wielding power abroad, it’s constrained by three deficits. The three deficits are as follows.
The first is a financial deficit. This is an empire that relies increasingly on foreign capital to keep its economy going.
It is a manpower deficit. It cannot deploy at any time more than a quarter of a million troops overseas which is a laughably small number considering how many able bodied American men there are.
And it has an attention deficit. And indeed it’s the first empire to have attention deficit disorder because almost every imperial undertaking has to be over successfully within four years or it gets abandoned. And that’s not a function of some kind of cultural attention span problem. It’s a function of the American electoral system. Results have to be delivered very quickly. And no empire can deliver the transformation of Mesopotamia in a four year timeframe. I mean nobody could have done that. It would take you at least 40 years to turn Iraq into something resembling a stable society, and nobody at any point to my knowledge has anticipated a 40 year timeframe.
So we have a paradox. The American empire is economically stronger than any empire ever. In terms of its military lead over the competition, it’s out of sight. It was never a time when Britain was so far ahead of its competition. But despite these enormous advantages it’s very dysfunctional as an empire. It really can’t direct sufficient financial resources through its imperial undertakings. It never has enough men where they’re needed. And above all else its electorate loses interest in hot, poorer countries almost as soon as they’ve been occupied. And these are the reasons why I think that the American empire may be on the way down.
There’s a fourth deficit which I hadn’t fully appreciated when I wrote the book, but I’m happy to add it now; and that is the legitimacy deficit. Empires need above all else collaborators. You can’t run an empire on force alone. You need local indigenous support for it to be viable. And one of the most interesting failures of this most recent American administration has been its failure to preserve the legitimacy of American power which has collapsed to the extent the United States is more unpopular around the world than it has ever been, certainly since records began. And that makes it even harder to be a successful empire. If everybody hates you, it’s not going to last.
Recorded on: Oct 15 2007
Read full transcript »
Niall Ferguson is a Scottish-born historian, political commentator, and public intellectual. He is also the Lawrence Tisch Professor of History at Harvard. Ferguson graduated from Magdalen College and studied for two years as a Hanseatic Scholar in Hamburg and Berlin. Before joining the Harvard faculty, Ferguson taught at Oxford University and New York University. A prolific commentator on contemporary politics and economics – he came out in favor of the Iraq War in 2003 &ndash – Ferguson is a contributing editor for the Financial Times and publishes regularly elsewhere in the British and American press. In 2004, Time named him one of the world’s hundred most influential people. Ferguson is the bestselling author of the popular histories The Pity of War: Explaining World War One, Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire, and The War of the World. Ferguson splits his time between the United Kingdom and the United States.
Read more about Niall Ferguson »
DELICIOUS
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
EMAIL
What should America be doing? America needs to find a new way of thinking. idea by Billy Collins in The United States
Paul Krugman on What Shaped America The great land of reinvention. idea by Paul Krugman in The United States
John McCain on NAFTA NAFTA has created millions of jobs, says McCain.
Letterman Writer Gives Full Frontal Nudity the OK
Geithner Answers Questions on His Financial Plan
Eleven Technologies That Will Revolutionize Business
Having Sex With Lolita in Tehran
How to Be a Smart Adopter
Ricky Gervais on Religion
Michael Bloomberg Action Plan
Ray Kurzweil on Living Well Forever
Eight Ways Microblogging Will Transform Your Company
Original content is for Non-commercial use under 
"An empire that collapses does it from within"
I agree China and India are completely overrated and in absolutely no position to become a dominant power within the next 25 years.
However, do I think that America is an empire in decline?...well I am not so sure...
I often think, "what will happen when the sleeping giant 'truly' awakens?" Right now I think it has simply rolled over, shook off an deep sleep and put its feet on the floor. Its hardly stood up!
The great wall, most populated, communist,
nationalist, made in China and human rights record are the thing you have in mind about China. What else do you know about China?
However, you can't escape the simple facts that you point out. They are universal truths and exactly what we are talking about. They are the reasons China will never become a economic superpower of the world like the USA or more accurately North America.
I think one of the problems is that Americans have historically prided themselves on being a nation of amateurs.
Originally it really was a nation of misfits. The "Gentlemen" who came with John Smith to the Virginia Colony had to learn to do jobs they were not trained to do or perish. While many perished, these and other European rejects/dissidents (including religious dissenters, younger sons, unhappy spouses, refugees, debtors, and even gays and lesbians) soon learned new skills. American art/craft forms like the Kentucky rifle, the quilt, and Jazz came out of a DYI society on which we have continued to build. New kinds of jobs--cowboys, mountain men, school marms--ventured forth alongside people whose behavior had been criminalized elsewhere. In those earliest years, prostitutes found rich husbands, thieves became judges, apprentices became slaveholders. Anyone of European descent could be anything if they survived long enough.
Today, this is reflected in the idea that political "outsiders" can better serve the country than those who have made a career of doing so. This would be laughable in other long-standing democracies. But attention deficit was built in from the beginning.
America has made its own greatness out of this, calling upon innovation where none might be expected, hailing new things but often unable to sustain them.
I wonder what we will do next?