Video Player by Kaltura

  Bookmark and Share

11:54

Interview Transcript

Discuss

Default_normal

Frank Denbow on November 17, 2008, 9:41 PM

Michael Eric Dyson is one of my favorite speakers on politics, hip-hop and the black community. His words resonate with me greatly and I appreciate all of his contributions.

I have to take issue with the full defense of Reverend Wright, however. The reliance on conspiracy theories to fill in the gaps in understanding of the motives and intentions of those with power and influence is not admirable when it is unsubstantiated. It feeds into the same fear-mongering that you decry from the Bush administration. The Reverend Wrights of the world do not seem to explore these landmine issues with a care necessary to sincerely inform their constituents, rather than their emotions. Some of his statements (like the AIDS soruce) are just plain wrong and have no factual basis. We need to ensure that truth is upheld, or else our unwavering support of Rev Wright will lead to more black leaders closer to Khalid Muhammed and Malik Zulu Shabazz than Mr Dyson.

I also would like to ask at what time do we let go of history in order to evolve socially? Will we ever be at a point where the tinge of Jim Crow is just a historical mention, instead of a burden that black Americans will carry with them wherever they go? The black leaders that rely on making the visceral pain seem present, then motivating that anguish into hatred for its perpetrators. This way of thinking does not move us forward and instead seeks to connote that “separate but equal” was the right way all along.

We should applaud useful and thoughtful critique of American policy in the church, but not at all costs. As you say, this is true patriotism.

User_rusj_05469b8dd

Vicki Nikolaidis on July 4, 2009, 10:32 AM

Michael Eric has given his explanation in a very kind way.

My feeling about the “white” reaction was disgust.

First: the acceptance of the media manipulation.

Secon: the inablility to put into historical context the month and year Rev. Wright’s comments were made.

Third: Not at least trying to make a workable democracy and honoring the right of free speech.

Fourth: refusing to acknowlede that Rev. Wright was not running for president, was not acting as a journalist – he was giving a sermon in a church which is supposed to be a safe setting in which to let out emotions.

Fifth: the dismissal of apatheid in America. Where little girls still can’t go to school with white kids without being called nxxxxx, not even in the "new millinium.’  Where boys and men are chosen for arrest, violent attacks and prison regardless of their age or profession. Where boys are sacrificed by the powers that be to start taking drugs ASAP so more money can be made by those who have the most  money.  (youth, whatever color, urban and rural, if they are poor, are sacrificed for this greed, by the way.)  And the obvious prison problem, most crimes done by whites, most prisoners have dark skin.

I wouldn’t say it was a reaction of white skinned Americans but the reaction of those citizens of the U.S. who are nervous about speaking truth to power.


Add a Comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register