Question: How have the rules of business changed?
Mendonca: It’s actually more possible to move market share than it might be in a normal environment and so being able to have better awareness and being able to more quickly respond competitively is of more importance.
Question: How can technology help?
Mendonca: Real time monitoring is a process by which companies are building business intelligence to understand in the way that a national intelligence agency would, what is actually going on in the ground, on the ground in different parts of the world [and] in different parts of their business, which allows them to more quickly respond to changes in the external economic environment [as well as] to competitive moves, to changes in the financial markets, to changes in prices and reactions of different moves that they are making so that they can have an awareness of how each of those changes may influence what their business response should be and more quickly adapt to them.
Question: How can companies best leverage tech investments?
Mendonca: Even before the crisis the internet and other related communications and information technologies enabled a level of transparency inside of institutions not just businesses but government and social sector institutions that was not possible before, whether it’s Yelp for restaurants, whether it’s YouTube for social movements, whether it’s the ability to create a movement on the internet that creates a new president. Those are environments that would not have been possible without the ubiquitousness, the capability and the low cost of technology. We’ve not yet seen what that means for how companies and large organizations actually operate in that new environment -- it’s going to force a level of transparency, it’s going to force a level of ability to respond quickly to things that is going to challenge many traditionally organized institutions. I think in the intermediate term that is actually going to be good. It creates a kind of competitive pressure, a kind of necessity to deliver in the light of day that in general will be good. It will particularly be challenging but in some ways will be very good for the most opaque institutions particularly in the government— creating visibility into how money is spent, creating visibility into what the real returns on invest are, creating visibility into the actual activities that occur and how well they are done or not, creating visibility into how customers and tax payers and employees think about institutions -- [all this is] challenging but it forces institutions to be better and that’s good for the economy.
Question: Can technology heighten risk?
Mendonca: It requires that technology be thoughtfully invested against processes and activities that actually make a difference for the organization, and that you adapt how you do business to reflect that technology. I think that’s going to be true in the next generation of web 2.0 technologies as well. They can be important enablers of allowing particularly complex transactions and interactions between individuals and groups within a company and between organizations to happen much more effectively, but they need to be done in a way which are effectively implemented and processes that are changed to take advantage of that. I personally find that quite exciting and the opportunities for knowledge sharing, for real collaboration, for opening up ways to interact with people half way across the globe in a real time way interactively is just quite exciting. And for someone who spends half their life on an airplane, being able to do that in video conference in video conference rather than getting on an airplane for a one hour meeting I find quite compelling as well.
Question: Has virtual technology changed business forever?
Mendonca: I think the availability of some technologies that allow for virtual interactions whether it’s really high quality video conference or web presence, don’t diminish the need for personal interaction, they just change the nature of it. And what it means is that you can use the time when you’re together for the kind of social interactions and getting to know people and really creating trust and the relationships that then enable you to operate effectively, virtually, going forward. It doesn’t diminish the importance of being together it just changes the purpose of that and allows you to be more effectively using your time in different ways given the availability of personal interaction and technology in mediated interactions and other setting.
Discuss
Clifford Marr on May 16, 2009, 7:25 PM
The idea that it is easier now to move market share than in sound economic times, is compelling and inspiring. I disagree, however, with another point Mr. Mendonca made— that personal interaction will always trump virtual interaction. For the moment, this may be true, but I believe not for the long haul. Also, as business becomes more and more global and companies no longer wish to spend resources on travel (of both a human capital nature, and also simply the cost of getting people from place to place) theability for all relevant parties to be in the same place at the same time, will become less and less viable. And, I believe technology will help us bridge the gap. Many people fear change, but it is inevitable and needed.
Peter Hopkins on June 3, 2009, 12:15 AM
The notion of real-time monitoring that Mendonca references is pretty striking — especially his analogy that companies are now following consumer behavior with the same circumspection that national intelligence agencies follow foreign agents!
Tobias Preston on June 3, 2009, 5:47 PM
It’s difficult not to be excited about the new levels of transparency that the internet is bringing to organizations both public and private. It gives hope for global democracy, better outcomes in healthcare, and the potential for the end of corruption and global prosperity.
Mara Jaden on June 3, 2009, 5:52 PM
Real time monitoring is a bit of an intimidating idea, but at the same time, it seems like this is the technology that is really going to faciliate our transition into a functioning global economy — if companies are able to monitor their international investments with the same level of attention and detail that they monitor domestic projects, it sort of blows everything wide open. I guess the key will be making these technologies affordable and more available to small businesses.
Bradley Talbot on June 11, 2009, 7:46 PM
I think Mendoca is right that technology has indeed changed business forever, but I’m not sure about his conclusion that it is for the better. I’ve used teleconference and videoconference a good deal in my work – and even with these technologies used in tandem with personal interaction it is still not the same. I strongly beleive that technology has harmed the relationship side of business interactions a great deal. Does effectiveness of one’s time take priority over the level of trust and understanding that one can develop through a live personal interaction instead of a virtual one? I don’t think so.
Maria Garcia-Reyes on June 12, 2009, 12:31 PM
Mendoca brought up Yelp and YouTube as examples of companies that empower individuals to be more involved in the community – large or small – around them. But from what I understand many brands do not have good relationships with these two entities.
Advertisers tend to be fearful of YouTube. Actually adverising through the system is risky because brands cede almost all power to the user generating the content – and who knows what they are going post! As for Yelp! I’ve heard that many establishments really dislike the lack of power they have over negative reviews. Sure, I assume that there are certainly poor reviews that are well deserved – but I understand the places reaction to one-off poor comments that can drive traffic away.
Laura Gordon on June 12, 2009, 12:58 PM
I think that real time monitoring is only going to be even more the norm in the future. But, no, not for monitoring people. I see it as radio tracking devices for packages – and not just some – but all packages. When Wal*Mart ships from distribution centers to retail stores they will know exactly where the item is and when it is going to arrive on site. Point of sale information is only going to improve. And all of this information is going to help business managers make better decisions in the future.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register