Topic: Jonathan Zittrain on Nicholas Negroponte's One Laptop per Child Project
Jonathan Zittrain: I closed the book with the XO, otherwise known as the one laptop per child project, because I feel in some ways that in the developed world, we've had our romp, through generative technologies, at a time when we had the innocence of not realizing just how important they'd become. We could do stuff unselfconsciously, code those flying toasters, because it was all fun. It wasn't some huge dot com play worth billions of dollars. At the time, we were messing around. It's harder to keep that sense of unselfconsciousness going, now that we know what the stakes are, and how vitally important the technologies have become. I think the developing world, there's less, at the moment, invested in it. As the next 1 to 2 billion people get online, what technologies will they be given? Will it be in a consumerist model? Here's a new mobile phone, and you can use this mobile phone to check the weather and see crop reports and stuff like that. Very useful, but sterile. Or will it be a technology that lets people in those communities, the one nerd out of 2,000 that might be hanging around, learns to affect the way the phone works, will they have a chance to have a vote and to hack around and to have fun? I'm hoping the answer is yes, on the faith that when they do, it'll be put generally to interesting and good uses, rather than to bad ones. There are people I quote in that chapter, Gene Spafford, at Purdue, who says, "I can't believe this one laptop per child program, that's putting more or less generative laptops in the hands of kids." It's like, my god, we have the plague going on right now. What we need is to give rats to people, because he's figuring, there's already enough spam and trouble. Why would you give people the tools to make more? I guess I disagree with that, but that's a risk. It's a spin of the wheel, to see how it will be used. It's also interesting to see the ways in which the one laptop per child is a combination of sterile and generative. In order not to have kids have them stolen from them, soon after they receive them, they actually have a phone home feature. If the laptop doesn't check in at the designated school every so often, it dies, and that makes it less worthy of stealing, just like a car with a low jack that disables the car. That requires some element of control form the center.
Recorded on: 3/8/08
Discuss
Monte Linn on April 24, 2008, 1:22 PM
When I first heard of this program I was amazed at the vision and the horsepower driving this idea forward.
………..a moment later I questioned how all the ego's in this endeavor, could be checked at the door so the goal could be achieved.
I am not surprised about the controversy. Even though Bill Gates has a history of Philanthropy, Microsoft's corporate image is one of a seek and destroy corporate culture. I would question wether the independence of this program could be maintained.
I personally am a fan of open source. But I would also bow to the powers that can make sure this program's goals, are achieved.
Whatever it takes………….acheive this goal!
Monte Linn on April 24, 2008, 5:22 PM
When I first heard of this program I was amazed at the vision and the horsepower driving this idea forward.
………..a moment later I questioned how all the ego’s in this endeavor, could be checked at the door so the goal could be achieved.
I am not surprised about the controversy. Even though Bill Gates has a history of Philanthropy, Microsoft’s corporate image is one of a seek and destroy corporate culture. I would question wether the independence of this program could be maintained.
I personally am a fan of open source. But I would also bow to the powers that can make sure this program’s goals, are achieved.
Whatever it takes………….acheive this goal!
Bruce Fowler on May 20, 2008, 3:26 AM
The program started out as a wonder of rediscovering what information technology could do for education. Now it has been sabotaged by the West's corporate oligarchs and is failing before it could actually start. If anything OLPC is an embarrassment of the continued imperialism that defines western european civilization.
Bruce Fowler on May 20, 2008, 7:26 AM
The program started out as a wonder of rediscovering what information technology could do for education. Now it has been sabotaged by the West’s corporate oligarchs and is failing before it could actually start. If anything OLPC is an embarrassment of the continued imperialism that defines western european civilization.
Justen Robertson on April 18, 2009, 3:06 PM
The idea that one should be fearful of putting generative technology in the hands of children or regular people as a whole is abhorrent. “There’s already enough spam and junk out there” – really? Is that really an enlightened point of view, that one horse’s ass should be the sole arbiter of value and exercise control over who gets to attempt to generate it?
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register