Jonathan Lovell
Recent Activity
Re: Stephon Alexander Moves Beyond Albert Einstein
I have been studying this for fifteen years. I hope I am not stepping on your toes. As you have stated the understanding of mass must be examined. I have already published this idea, so I do not expect intellectual theft. E=1/VcubedCsquared. Where V is volume. What does this mean? You will have to think this through for there is not enough space for me to continue. At the end you will see we can calculate the exact origin of the universe,we can understand dark energy and dark matter, why spiral galaxies spin the wrong way, and many other unexplainable quandries that science simply puts off untill an answer can be found. We will also find our Universe is not all here. We can calculate if we are on the leading, or receading side of the origin of our Universe. If our Universe is expanding and that rate of expansion is accellerating then there must be a mass being caused to slow, and therefore creating the necessary energy to cause the expansion. Also less than fifty percent of this mass has been realized or else the rate of expansion would be reducing.You were asking for a theory that would answer all, or most, of the unexplainable.So is this a Bigthink? … Read More
October 16, 2008 |
Jonathan Lovell commented on Why don't stable atoms constantly emit light? on October 16, 2008, 12:52 AM
You are all correct. The one rule that seems to be forgotten is centrifugal force. If an electron is to increase in speed it's orbit around the nucleus must reduce for the measurable forces of gravity to hold it together. If it should shed energy, "and light up", the orbit of the electron would increase.
Jonathan Lovell commented on Do Black Holes Exist in Our Sub-Atomic World? on October 15, 2008, 12:33 AM
Why would an economist be worrying about such things?It is late and I must work tomorrow so,Where V is volume; does E=1/Vcubed Csquared make any sense to you?
Jonathan Lovell commented on YoYo Theory of Black Holes as Stars in Transition to Extreme Density and Back on October 15, 2008, 12:19 AM
If an object was travelling toward you at exactly the speed of light for any ,any length of time,all of the light emitted or reflected from it during that time would arrive at your retina now. You would see a flash of light, much like a visual sonic boom. If I am standing on the other side of this event I would see a black hole. Welcome to the rabbit hole Dorothy.
Jonathan Lovell commented on Re: Stephon Alexander Moves Beyond Albert Einstein on December 9, 2008, 1:36 AM
Just got back. Thank you for your input. Your annalogy is interesting, but the deer will ultimately slow. First the farthest, then the others. Unfortunatly the firecracker has long been spent, if the bang is your idea. In my Universe the bang is still happening and the deer are still accellerating. In fact I would suggest it would be spelt "bbbbaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG". And we are not anywhere near the third a . Our Universe acts and reacts as if there is 75% more matter here than we can account for. This is explained as dark energy or dark matter. Our Universe is not all here yet. The remainder is still travelling faster than the speed of light from our perspective. It is still having an effect on our Universe. Once half of it has slowed to sublight speed the rate of expansion will slow. This is when you will know the halflife of your Universe.