Question: What do you make of Intellipedia?
Jimmy Wales: It’s really interesting. I mean, I actually talked to some of the people who were involved in the Intellipedia project, and you know, a big part of what they face is, again, quite boring and mundane, right? If you’re an intelligence agency, and your job is to gather information so that the leadership of the government can make good decisions, it’s really a bad thing if you give bad information because your internal structures are broken. Because they’re not taking advantage of normal, modern technologies, and that’s a big part of what apparently happens, and has happened in the past is that, because they have very rigid information flow structures. The right people don’t get the right information at the right time, and errors are made, and that’s just terrible. Certainly, you know, I think wherever you stand on certain questions like military action in various places, right, I think almost everybody on all sides of the question would certainly agree that, “Gee, before we take any military action, we better make absolutely damn sure we have good information, right? So that we avoid it when we need to, and we only do it when we have to, and need to, and it makes sense.” Almost no one would disagree with that and say, “Actually I hope the government bumbles around blindly with no idea what’s going on,” right? So for me, it’s a positive sign to see that at least some people are starting to take seriously that, gee, there’s a huge information problem that needs to be solved.
Recorded on: 04/30/2008
Discuss
shawn disney on February 7, 2009, 10:18 PM
Mr. Wales seems confused about what “information” or “intelligence” (in that sense) is. Objective information especially about foreigners’ ideas is (usually?) filtered out according to the ideology of the Bosses. The Vietnam era is only the most striking example of this. There wasn’t anything wrong with the information, the Administration simply rejected it on (perhaps unconscious)ideological grounds. That could be a very good reason for suggesting that maybe not having agencies like the CIA would save us from the Hubris of imagining that we actually understand the situation, and perhaps we would not be so quick to rush in to “fix it”. Our fix-it efforts have been a total flop in all cases, have they not? disigny
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register