Question: When you read the newspapers, what issues stand out?
Jim Lehrer: Well I think that the biggest issue for us – as a country, as a nation, as a people, as an American people – is that we are the most powerful nation in the world any way you want to look at it. Even with all those problems, we’re still the military power of the world, the economic power of the world. Yes, China and others are growing, but we’re still the economic power of the world. We’re the cultural power of the world. People wear our clothes. They listen to our music. They see our movies.
For me, the biggest issue of all is how we, the American people, exercise this power.
There are all kinds of ways to exercise power. One, you can use the fist. You can use the quiet talking way.
What troubles me is that we have not given enough thought, there’s not been enough open debate about how we exercise the power. What is it that we want to do with this military power? What is it we want to do with our economic power? For instance, the power to clean up things in the environment. Global warming; everybody is very concerned about global warming. And there are always going to be things like this. We have the power to fix these things. We have the power to influence others to do things. We, the United States of America, in my opinion, should be the power to get others to do the good things, and to stop the bad people from doing the bad things because. We have that power.
And it doesn’t mean that we have to exercise military power. Sometimes the best power is the power that’s not exercised. You just have it, you know? And if it’s exercised in restraint, sometimes it’s the most powerful thing there is. I just want to say to me, that is an issue. That’s why I want Presidents of the United States. I don’t give a damn what party they are or what their political persuasion is. I want the President of the United States to come to grips with the power that they have as the leader of this great power. And to quit acting. I’m not talking about pushing people around. Quite the contrary. Or making everybody look like us, and talk like us, and whatever. But to me our power is the number one issue. Everything else flows from that in my opinion.
Jim Lehrer: Well one thing I do know, that the 2008 presidential election is going to be, in my opinion, one of the most important elections we’ve had in this country in a long, long time.
We have no Vice President who’s automatically the nominee. We have no frontrunner, surefire nominee at this point. Everything is on the table.
I think we have a wide variety of candidates on both parties, plus the possibility of an Independent candidacy or two. We have an opportunity, and we have time. This campaign, people are complaining about how long the campaign is. I think that’s terrific. Everybody gets tested. Everybody gets known so that it increases the chances of our not making a mistake if we go through this long, long involved process that some people find boring. I don’t find it boring at all! How in the world can it be boring for a campaign that’s going to lead in the election of the President of the United States?
But anyhow, I’m optimistic that something really good’s going to come out of this election. And it has less to do with individuals – whoever wins – but the process is going to force everyone involved in the process to talk about things that matter.
Yes, Iraq is forefront. But there are all kinds of “have” and “have not” issues arising. There are an awful lot of people in this country – right now as we sit here – who are working eight hours a day, five days a week, and are not making enough money to house themselves and their families, educate their families. And the gap between the “haves” and the “have nots” in the United States of America is going up all of the time. That is a huge issue.
Education has a lot. The biggest issue everybody says, knee-jerk, “Education is a big issue.”
Well if it’s such a big issue why aren’t we fixing it? There’s not one thing in the way. We have all the resources. The United States of America can educate every child in America beautifully without even thinking about it. We have the resources. We have the people. We’re smart enough to do it. God knows we have the resources. Because educated people tend to be better citizens, better everything. And it really does raise all the votes and all of that.
Recorded: July 4, 2007.
Discuss
william miller on January 16, 2008, 2:47 PM
Regarding whether or not we, as Americans, are morally justified in spreading our enlightened way of living… perhaps we should be fairly certain that or ideas are capable of solving such problems as our nation faces. And there are many such problems: sustainability and environmental destruction come to mind.
william miller on January 16, 2008, 2:50 PM
p.s. I sincerely hope that our solutions to such problems can be found through science and reason- the age-old alternative being natural selection!
william miller on January 16, 2008, 7:47 PM
Regarding whether or not we, as Americans, are morally justified in spreading our enlightened way of living… perhaps we should be fairly certain that or ideas are capable of solving such problems as our nation faces. And there are many such problems: sustainability and environmental destruction come to mind.
william miller on January 16, 2008, 7:50 PM
p.s. I sincerely hope that our solutions to such problems can be found through science and reason- the age-old alternative being natural selection!
James Townsend on January 28, 2008, 10:22 AM
x
Musycks on March 13, 2008, 3:55 PM
Sam Harris is one of the sharpest thinkers to emerge in recent years. His book "The End of Faith' I carried with me touring the USA last year.. I used to carry it through airports cover out, just for fun. Only one woman in Salt Lake City commented, and that was to say she would love to live to see the 'end of faith'!
I love his clarity and simple elegance, and while I don't agree with all he says, his overall message should be shouted to the (godless) heavens.
Musycks on March 13, 2008, 7:55 PM
Sam Harris is one of the sharpest thinkers to emerge in recent years. His book "The End of Faith’ I carried with me touring the USA last year.. I used to carry it through airports cover out, just for fun. Only one woman in Salt Lake City commented, and that was to say she would love to live to see the ‘end of faith’!
I love his clarity and simple elegance, and while I don’t agree with all he says, his overall message should be shouted to the (godless) heavens.
brendan p on March 15, 2008, 9:10 AM
he didn't answer the question: is it more likely that something sparked the big bang, or that the big bang sparked itself from nothingness.
the question had nothing to do with a personal abrahamic god. is there a possibility of a creator? yes or no. his simulation response still begs the question of an initial creator to whomever created those who made the simulation.
he could respond by asking who created the creator, which is a fair point.
but it needs to be said that science has as much or as little to say about the moment of the big bang as does any religion. the laws of science break down at the moment of our universe's creation.
brendan p on March 15, 2008, 1:10 PM
he didn’t answer the question: is it more likely that something sparked the big bang, or that the big bang sparked itself from nothingness.
the question had nothing to do with a personal abrahamic god. is there a possibility of a creator? yes or no. his simulation response still begs the question of an initial creator to whomever created those who made the simulation.
he could respond by asking who created the creator, which is a fair point.
but it needs to be said that science has as much or as little to say about the moment of the big bang as does any religion. the laws of science break down at the moment of our universe’s creation.
Mary Coyote on March 29, 2008, 9:44 PM
verbal pocketplay posted: 'he didn't answer the question'
Yes he did. How could a super-loving super-intelligent entity give humankind give such poor quality Holy Books. Books that do not agree, and worse, contradict each other; books that convey hatred and violence towards the other, the unbeliever, slaves, women and children. Obviously god is NOT intelligent or loving, or that these books were written by human culture's attempts to explain their ignorance.
So, a creator as these books proposes is impossible. Now if you are looking for a creator without religion, then that is science, and we are still looking.
Mary Coyote on March 30, 2008, 1:44 AM
verbal pocketplay posted: ‘he didn’t answer the question’
Yes he did. How could a super-loving super-intelligent entity give humankind give such poor quality Holy Books. Books that do not agree, and worse, contradict each other; books that convey hatred and violence towards the other, the unbeliever, slaves, women and children. Obviously god is NOT intelligent or loving, or that these books were written by human culture’s attempts to explain their ignorance.
So, a creator as these books proposes is impossible. Now if you are looking for a creator without religion, then that is science, and we are still looking.
Cleo Aquitaine on June 3, 2008, 5:37 AM
Yes, there is the possibility of a creator, as Sam points out, the hypothesis that there is, is unfalsifiable.
This fact should be set against the evidence for there not being such an omnipresent God. Even in the absence of science, sheer intelligent reason should tell us that most if not all of the claims for and about the Abrahamic God and the bible are groundless.
Cleo Aquitaine on June 3, 2008, 9:37 AM
Yes, there is the possibility of a creator, as Sam points out, the hypothesis that there is, is unfalsifiable.
This fact should be set against the evidence for there not being such an omnipresent God. Even in the absence of science, sheer intelligent reason should tell us that most if not all of the claims for and about the Abrahamic God and the bible are groundless.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register