What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

We Don't "Know It All." But Here's What's Worth Celebrating

April 28, 2013, 11:30 AM
Cosmic-rays-lg

I've tried to write about the remarkable discoveries in science over the last 40 years because I think that's really what motivated me.  I want to communicate these amazing revelations about the universe.  And it is true that I argued that they suggest the universe could come from nothing without any supernatural shenanigans. That God becomes even more redundant and irrelevant than she was before. 

I think the point is that people sometimes misunderstand the claim that we know it all.  We don’t.  We don’t have laws of physics that take us back to equal zero. All we can do is argue based on the plausibility of what we know.  And what is amazing is if you asked "What are the characteristics that a universe would have if it were created from nothing by simple laws of nature" -- our universe has precisely those properties.  And it didn’t have to be that way.

Does that mean we can assert with certainty that the universe came for nothing just by natural phenomena?  No, but it’s plausible.  And that’s worth celebrating.  To me, it’s identical to the situation that we found ourselves a few hundred years ago with Darwin.  Before Darwin, life was a miracle.  There was special creation for every life form on Earth to live in the environment in which it lives.  But what Darwin showed is by simple assumptions, genetic variation in a population and natural selection, you could plausibly explain the evidence for all the diversity of life on Earth.  And in fact, that idea agreed with the data.

He didn’t know about DNA or the details of replication.  He didn’t have the detail theory, but it was plausible.  And that changed our picture, our understanding of biology, and our own origins. And what, to me, is wonderful, is that somehow in cosmology we are at a similar place.  We don’t have all the answers but we are beginning to be able to address these questions of our origins in a cosmic sense that I never would have imagined 25 years ago we could address.  And that is worth celebrating.  And that’s what I've tried to celebrate in my writing.

In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio. 

More from the Big Idea for Tuesday, August 13 2013

Scientism

Stephen Pinker has appropriated the word "scientism," which he says is "more of a boo-word than a label for any coherent doctrine," in order to embrace the defining practices of science.  The s... Read More…

 

We Don't "Know It All." But...

Newsletter: Share: