What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

McCarthyism 2.0: What Pieces of Paper Have You Signed Lately?

September 9, 2009, 10:59 AM
Vanj

Few of my pet peeves equal my distaste for conspiracy theories, whether it's that the moon landing was a hoax, that the Bush Administration had a hand in 9/11, or the anti-Obama "birther" nonsense. But are we really going to start McCarthyism 2.0 because Van Jones signed a 9/11 petition?

As you've probably seen by now, Jones, President Obama's green jobs czar, quit the administration this week. After TV blowhards like Glenn Beck found out about they 9/11 petition, and that Mr. Jones once called the Republican Party a bad name, they launched a campaign to have Jones fired that culminated in success.

Now, the LA Times reports, Beck and company are out for blood, asking their devoted followers to dig up dirt on the President's other "czars." Keith Olbermann, the Left's resident TV blowhard, responded by asking the folks at home to find unsavory secrets about Beck and his friends at Fox News.

The real problem for Jones was that he picked the wrong conspiracy to lend his name. Sen. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma maintains high office despite a long campaign declaring anthropogenic global warming to be an elaborate hoax on the American people. Several members of Congress have leant support to the "birthers" either by introducing legislation or refusing to disavow that circus. But while it's apparently OK for government officials to question whether the President is really an American, questioning his involvement in a national tragedy is a step too far when it comes to keeping your job. And thanks to Jones' misstep, it's war. 

I don't mean to suggest that candidates for government offices, even ones that don't require Congressional approval, ought to get a free pass from hard questioning. Rather, we've reached a point where our expectations are untenable. Thanks to flood of data in the information age, everybody's skeletons are preserved forever, be they unflattering Facebook photos or unflattering petitions signed. If your skeletons can be found, your political enemies will be sure to use all the channels of 21st century communication to make sure they spread around. And the end result is the Senate spending days grilling Justice Sotomayor about one remark and trying to start a race war.

Dirt-digging contests by partisan hacks are inevitable, as perhaps was Jones' demise—in Washington, you just can't spin away a "truthers" petition. But, as usual, what's required from the public is a little critical thinking rather than blind obedience to talking heads: which mistakes are really worth firing an elected official, and which aren't? National politicians were afraid to take bold stands long before the Internet and 24-hour "news." The road we're following now leads only to bigger cowardice: the only people who can reach elected office and stay there being the only ones who've never taken a stand on anything.

Jones may be too radical for the Right, despite the fact that the green energy revolution he envisioned for Big Think relies on the power of American capitalism and innovation. But somebody needs to lead the movement toward "green jobs," and that person probably won't be perfect. 

 

McCarthyism 2.0: What Piece...

Newsletter: Share: