Interview Transcript
Question: When you read the newspaper or watch the news, what issues stand out for you?
Sam Harris: Well what astonishes me when I read the newspaper or watch the news is how many problems are the direct result of what people believe about God. I mean there are days when I open the New York Times where fully half of the stories – in a way that’s unacknowledged by the paper – relate to people’s religious convictions. It’s a matter . . . I mentioned the Virginia Tech shooting. The role that religion played in providing a context for this shooting was never really discussed in the media. But we just hear that the mother happened to be a devout Christian, and schlepped her child from church to church in search of an exorcism. I just see continually our attention bound up in these competing ideas about God. At best, this is often just a waste of time. But at worst, it is just . . . it is manufacturing violence, and unnecessary conflict, and misuses of our resources. And what’s more, it is very rare that we acknowledge . . . I mean now we’re beginning to acknowledge the role that Islam is playing in Muslim terrorism; but even that has been very slow to come. I mean it has been obvious for many, many years – long before September 11th – that a certain style of Muslim infatuation was leading to this kind of jihad-y behavior. We’re . . . Because of the respect we afford religious faith, we are very slow to acknowledge its cause or role in conflict.
Question: What is the struggle in what you do?
Sam Harris: Well I think the biggest challenge as a matter of discourse and debate – and certainly the most frustrating challenge – is what comes from otherwise secular and even non-believing people who are just reluctant to admit how much mad work is being done because of religion in this world. I mean they either can’t believe that people really believe this stuff . . . So when a suicide bomber blows himself up in a crowd of children, this secular type of person will imagine, “That wasn’t religion. I mean it had nothing to do with a belief in paradise and 72 virgins. Who could believe that? This is a . . . some kind of psychological aberration. Or it’s caused by economic desperation, or policies in the region. I mean it’s not a matter of metaphysical beliefs.” I think the jury is in on this, and we know that people really do believe these things. They are telling us ad nauseum that they believe these things. And I don’t think there’s any more powerful rhetorical device for emphasis than blowing yourself up or flying a plane into a building. And I mean these people are really willing to die for what they believe. And we know it’s not a matter of economics. I’m gonna speak specifically to the Muslim word for a moment. We know it’s not a matter of economics and education, because this recent plot in the U.K., these are all doctors who are . . . who are aspiring suicide bombers. And you know, how much more education did these doctors need? One was a neurosurgeon. You find me a neurosurgeon suicide bomber, and you tell me the problem is education and economics, it clearly isn’t. And . . . but the deeper problem, and I think a far more sinister problem, is that it is possible to be well educated – so well educated that you can be a neurosurgeon – and still believe that you can get 72 virgins in paradise. And this is made possible by the fact that we have allowed a certain mode of thought – religion – to thrive in a cocoon of this sphere of protection from criticism. It is just taboo to criticize people’s religious beliefs.
Recorded on: Jul 4 2007
Sam Harris on the Dangers of Religion
Author
Again this year, the New Atheist is giving up God.
January 29, 2008 | In Belief
Discuss
Musycks on February 25, 2009, 9:23 PM
Mr Harris is as clear-eyed as usual in putting the absurdities of religious beliefs on dislpay once more.
The problem is indeed endemic as religious nonsense is so much a part of the societal fabric it’s accepted more of less unquestioningly. Indeed I await the day when a major newspaper at Xmas puts the word ‘alledged’ in front of the word ‘birth’ when discussing the goings on re Jesus, who fails the rudimentary historical test for existance (2 contemporaneous independant accounts).
Keep swingin’ Sam!
tim hall on April 11, 2009, 2:25 PM
It seems that it does little good to discuss religion when it’s greatest asset is fear. Until folks are intelligent enough to understand that they wake up afraid and base a lot of decision making on those fears, they cannot let go of that cultural support system that they call religion.
This also has complications in fitting in communities (jobs, friends, family,etc.) If your really abnormal(believe only in truth and facts) and live in a mostly Christian society you can be shunned to a certain degree. This slows the process of learning as a whole.
Until we teach in our edu. systems how to live without unjustified fear, we will continue to struggle with believing in myths as well as struggle with creating to our highest abilities instead of living safe and following others. With the great communication tools of today, i’m optimistic that we could achieve total reality by 2075.
Jonathan Files on June 16, 2009, 3:13 PM
Religions dangerous? Just because they divide the world into US vs. THEM (and God help you if you’re a “Them”!), oppose reason, logic, education, and science and have always done so since the beginning of recorded time? Oh, did I mention how VIOLENT these guys are? Fear religion, my friend — the little good it does is wholly mitigated by the harm it causes….
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register