Question: What should be the standard for science literary in the US?
Heidi Hammel: My sense, talking to the general public around the country, is that most people don’t have a very high level of scientific literacy. People seem to be afraid of science, and certainly people seem to be afraid of mathematics. And I think that’s such a shame, because I don’t think it’s as hard as people seem to think it is. You know, people have this idea that if you’re not brilliant like Einstein, you can’t be a scientist. And that’s just a myth. He was the one out of a million scientists, but there were 999,999 other scientists who were not as brilliant but who just do great science, as well. And so a lot of the work that I do is to try to dispel these myths about science being an arcane, hard field, and math being incomprehensible. I just think, you know what? We need to know math to be a good scientist, but math is a language, and we need to learn the language because that’s the language of science. And, you know, if I go to Sweden or Ethiopia, I can’t speak that language, and that doesn’t mean I can’t live in that country and function. I need to learn the language. It’s the same with science and math. You need to learn the language first, and then you can work in those fields. But it’s not mysterious and arcane. It’s a way of looking at the world, and a way of exploring the world, and trying to make sense of the world. It disappoints me that people are so frightened of science and frightened of math. I think the only way we’ll have a sea change in peoples’ appreciation of science, technology, engineering, math, is through a broad effort, partially part of the government, partially the work of scientists like me, who communicate to the public, partially the parents of young kids, not propagating myths about science is hard and, oh, I never did well in math, you know. You don’t need to do that. Yeah. It’s got to be a joint effort on everybody’s part. People need to realize that the world is changing. It’s a very different world than it was 20, 30 years ago, and we have to be aware of that as a culture, as a society, and recognize that the rest of the world is moving on and moving on pretty quickly. And if we want to maintain the level of comfort in our culture and society that we’ve become accustomed to, we have to really get in there, and we have to educate our kids, and bring them up to speed commensurate with what’s going on in the other countries, and I worry that that’s not happening.
Discuss
Matthew Wilcoxson on February 5, 2009, 6:10 PM
I agree, many people do not have a good understanding of many sciences, some even fear looking foolish so avoid the subject. Unfortunately this is going to cause quite serious problems in the coming years. Major decisions on where science can take us will need to be made and only with a good grasp of the science can an informed decision be made. (Some current good examples are: GM crops, Stem cell research and global warming)
(It should be noted though, that there are other scientific areas which do not relay so heavilly on math, such as biology and geolgy.)
Connie Chow on August 23, 2009, 10:23 AM
I very much appreciate Dr. Hammel’s comparison of science/mathematics to culture and language. It would serve us well to be explicit that teachers and scientists etc are acculturating students (and parents if we had the means) to such, and just like language, practice is just as important, if not more so, than theory/book knowledge.
I direct an after school program, Science Club for Girls, that tries to make science fun, and embed learning in a playful environment. This may sound trivial, but we are helping our participants create positive psychological associations with science, math and engineering, instead of fear, which, as Dr. Hammel pointed out, is the emotion that most people in the US associate with maths and science.
I think, unfortunately, that a recent Ad Council campaign, KnowHow2Go.org, to encourage college access, unintentionally perpetuates the myth that science and math (and foreign language) are intimidating, represented by fearsome gladiators. The individual ads on algebra II and foreign language are a bit more humorous, and makes an attempt to present the subjects as more approachable. No doubt, these subjects are not easy, and requires rigor. But what area of serious study does not?
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register