Bookmark and Share

3:20

Interview Transcript

Discuss

User_rbgy_8adca6717

John succo on January 18, 2008, 3:24 PM

I agree that small is better but i think people are lazy and the only way we as a society are going to have an effect on the environment is to make it cost effective…. which alot of things are.. like light bulbs and insulation but we need to get alternative power sources cheaper so all different types of incomes can afford it and have it benefiting them.

User_rbgy_8adca6717

John succo on January 18, 2008, 8:24 PM

I agree that small is better but i think people are lazy and the only way we as a society are going to have an effect on the environment is to make it cost effective…. which alot of things are.. like light bulbs and insulation but we need to get alternative power sources cheaper so all different types of incomes can afford it and have it benefiting them.

User_rdtb_bb423d834

John Zawacki on January 19, 2008, 2:55 PM

Don't Forget!!!!!!
The Atmosphere is not the only part of the environment!!!!!!
Carbon is not the only consern!!!!!
Mass extinction is happening now due to habitat destruction from human's so called :Development:

User_rdtb_bb423d834

John Zawacki on January 19, 2008, 7:55 PM

Don’t Forget!!!!!!
The Atmosphere is not the only part of the environment!!!!!!
Carbon is not the only consern!!!!!
Mass extinction is happening now due to habitat destruction from human’s so called :Development:

User_rslp_b4572ab33

Shawn Wilson on February 2, 2008, 4:15 AM

yes I agree Life Long Learner! And It will only get worse as long as we continue to ignore the population problem.. just way to many ppl on this planet. The more diseases we cure. The longer our life span increases and the more babies we keep having with no thought of how much this planet can sustain…the planet like any organism can only produce so much food energy, and oxygen from the available growing surface area, the planet has 30% land mass and only 38% of that is used for crops. And oxygen producing phytoplankton on the ocean is not being used effectively either. And also can only produce so much. when it comes down to room for us to surive yes the animals will have to go…In the animal kingdom the weak go and the strong survive this is mostly there population control along with pretetors. but in our species. when the strong become weak we give them pills…and a place to live.

User_rslp_b4572ab33

Shawn Wilson on February 2, 2008, 4:15 AM

yes I agree Life Long Learner! And It will only get worse as long as we continue to ignore the population problem.. just way to many ppl on this planet. The more diseases we cure. The longer our life span increases and the more babies we keep having with no thought of how much this planet can sustain…the planet like any organism can only produce so much food energy, and oxygen from the available growing surface area, the planet has 30% land mass and only 38% of that is used for crops. And oxygen producing phytoplankton on the ocean is not being used effectively either. And also can only produce so much. when it comes down to room for us to surive yes the animals will have to go…In the animal kingdom the weak go and the strong survive this is mostly there population control along with pretetors. but in our species. when the strong become weak we give them pills…and a place to live.

User_rslp_b4572ab33

Shawn Wilson on February 2, 2008, 4:24 AM

graham : I live in Nova Scotia Canada, got a question for you..Ive traveled quite a bit throughout the U.S. and Canada, and have noticed that forestry company's are not introducing dif. species of trees. to areas…like say bringing back forest cedar or even british columbia's red cedar..to Nova Scotia… it was prety much completely wiped out there are maby 3 wild patches in the whole province left…I have successfully grown timber cedar and they are about 14 feet tall now.. all 200 of them are growing great…It would seem that the re-foresters are re-planting the same species that has always grown in that area..why not indroduce new species?

User_rslp_b4572ab33

Shawn Wilson on February 2, 2008, 4:24 AM

graham : I live in Nova Scotia Canada, got a question for you..Ive traveled quite a bit throughout the U.S. and Canada, and have noticed that forestry company's are not introducing dif. species of trees. to areas…like say bringing back forest cedar or even british columbia's red cedar..to Nova Scotia… it was prety much completely wiped out there are maby 3 wild patches in the whole province left…I have successfully grown timber cedar and they are about 14 feet tall now.. all 200 of them are growing great…It would seem that the re-foresters are re-planting the same species that has always grown in that area..why not indroduce new species?

User_rslp_b4572ab33

Shawn Wilson on February 2, 2008, 9:15 AM

yes I agree Life Long Learner! And It will only get worse as long as we continue to ignore the population problem.. just way to many ppl on this planet. The more diseases we cure. The longer our life span increases and the more babies we keep having with no thought of how much this planet can sustain…the planet like any organism can only produce so much food energy, and oxygen from the available growing surface area, the planet has 30% land mass and only 38% of that is used for crops. And oxygen producing phytoplankton on the ocean is not being used effectively either. And also can only produce so much. when it comes down to room for us to surive yes the animals will have to go…In the animal kingdom the weak go and the strong survive this is mostly there population control along with pretetors. but in our species. when the strong become weak we give them pills…and a place to live.

User_rslp_b4572ab33

Shawn Wilson on February 2, 2008, 9:15 AM

yes I agree Life Long Learner! And It will only get worse as long as we continue to ignore the population problem.. just way to many ppl on this planet. The more diseases we cure. The longer our life span increases and the more babies we keep having with no thought of how much this planet can sustain…the planet like any organism can only produce so much food energy, and oxygen from the available growing surface area, the planet has 30% land mass and only 38% of that is used for crops. And oxygen producing phytoplankton on the ocean is not being used effectively either. And also can only produce so much. when it comes down to room for us to surive yes the animals will have to go…In the animal kingdom the weak go and the strong survive this is mostly there population control along with pretetors. but in our species. when the strong become weak we give them pills…and a place to live.

User_rslp_b4572ab33

Shawn Wilson on February 2, 2008, 9:24 AM

graham : I live in Nova Scotia Canada, got a question for you..Ive traveled quite a bit throughout the U.S. and Canada, and have noticed that forestry company’s are not introducing dif. species of trees. to areas…like say bringing back forest cedar or even british columbia’s red cedar..to Nova Scotia… it was prety much completely wiped out there are maby 3 wild patches in the whole province left…I have successfully grown timber cedar and they are about 14 feet tall now.. all 200 of them are growing great…It would seem that the re-foresters are re-planting the same species that has always grown in that area..why not indroduce new species?

User_rslp_b4572ab33

Shawn Wilson on February 2, 2008, 9:24 AM

graham : I live in Nova Scotia Canada, got a question for you..Ive traveled quite a bit throughout the U.S. and Canada, and have noticed that forestry company’s are not introducing dif. species of trees. to areas…like say bringing back forest cedar or even british columbia’s red cedar..to Nova Scotia… it was prety much completely wiped out there are maby 3 wild patches in the whole province left…I have successfully grown timber cedar and they are about 14 feet tall now.. all 200 of them are growing great…It would seem that the re-foresters are re-planting the same species that has always grown in that area..why not indroduce new species?

Default_normal

Rachele Antenucci on November 30, 2008, 5:59 PM

I think it is SCANDALOUS that The Sierra Club of Modesto shows up at planning commission meetings to side with the local governments on forcing people to “donate their properties or face a costly legal battle they will lose for sure” by lying and saying their rural sunny dry properties have “tiger salamanders.” Then after the GOV sweeps in and commits eminent domain abuse paying less than 10% “fair market value” for the ENVIRONMENTALLY discounted property, the land is then rezoned and developed. The former owners are left with the balance of their mortgates to file bankruptcy and homeless and renting. What a lovely environment their property becomes filled in with concrete where no “tiger salamander” can really live. Environmentalists really help the government steal homes from hard working tax paying citizens so a few greedy wealthy people can get richer. Let’s be honest folks!

Default_normal

Rachele Antenucci on November 30, 2008, 6:02 PM

I forgot to mention that in my county the scandalous Sierra Club was paid property tax payers money in “donation” form.


Add a Comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register