What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Pioneer of IVF Wins Nobel Prize; Anti-Choice Tantrums Ahead

October 4, 2010, 11:04 AM

Biologist Robert G. Edwards has won the Nobel Prize for his work on in vitro fertilization. Edwards and his late colleague, gynecologist Patrick Steptoe, helped an infertile woman give birth to the world's first "test tube baby" in July of 1978.

According to the New York Times, the initial controversy over IVF has pretty much died out:

Though in vitro fertilization is now widely accepted, the birth of the first test tube baby was greeted with intense concern that the moral order was subverted by unnatural intervention in the mysterious process of creating a human being. Dr. Edwards was well aware of the ethical issues raised by his research and took the lead in addressing them.

The objections gradually died away, except on the part of the Roman Catholic Church, as it became clear that the babies born by in vitro fertilization were healthy and that their parents were overjoyed to be able to start a family. Long-term follow-ups have confirmed the essential safety of the technique. [NYT]

The rest of the world is comfortable with IVF, as evidenced by today's Nobel Prize announcement. However, anti-choice extremists are still fighting that battle here in the United States.

It would be political suicide to challenge IVF directly. (Update: Anti-choicers in Colorado didn't get that memo.) For the most part, anti-choicers don't want to be seen denying infertile couples their only chance to have a biological family. Instead, they've chosen an more abstract target in the great battle between embryos and women: Embryonic stem cell research.

IVF treatments produce many more embryos than will ultimately become pregnancies. So, a lot of embryos are discarded or frozen indefinitely. Some are turned into embryonic stem cell lines.

All federally-funded research involving human embryonic stem cells ground to a court-ordered halt earlier this year while a federal judge weighed a lawsuit challenging this kind of funding. Research dollars are flowing again, thanks to a temporary reprieve from a higher court.

Ron Johnson, the GOP senate candidate in Wisconsin said last week that he opposes embryonic stem cell research. "If there's a program "that's morally objectionable to a high percentage of the American public, that's probably something we shouldn't spend money on," Johnson told the AP. Johnson's opponent, Sen. Russ Feingold, strongly supports the research.

[Photo credit: Shows the kind of HESC that were injected into the spine of a patient with ALS, a lethal motor neuron disease, via CNN Health.]



Pioneer of IVF Wins Nobel P...

Newsletter: Share: