What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

The One Economic Policy America Truly Needs

December 27, 2011, 9:42 AM
Meritocracy

Americans are unhappy with inequality.  Americans are unhappy with campaign financing. Americans are unhappy with differences in pay and unemployment.  And more than anything, Americans are unhappy that the American dream - going from rags to riches - seems to be fading away.

Actually, Americans are unhappy about just one thing: the erosion of our meritocracy.  It's a simple thing, too.  Being rewarded for your achievements, talents, and ideas seems so reasonable, so fundamentally American, and yet it happens less and less.  Money, connections, and group identities are determining who gets the opportunities in our economy, whether they're in education, the labor market, or politics.  And that is a very worrying fact for our economy.

Meritocracy is a fundamental driver of economic growth.  It ensures that we take full advantage of the opportunities created in new business and industries.  Without it, an opportunity that might have gone to a poor but talented person is more likely to go to a rich but not-so-bright person. When that happens, the opportunity is wasted.

People can feel that meritocracy is disappearing.  Universities squeezed by shrinking endowments and lower public funding are being forced to reconsider need-blind admissions. Candidates pull out of elections  or never even throw their hats into the ring when they can't compete in fundraising. The likelihood that children will achieve a socioeconomic status higher than their parents' has fallen steadily for decades.

Despite these clear signs of the problem, some people believe that our economy is still meritocratic.  Indeed, it is more meritocratic than many others; for one thing, racial, religious, and gender discrimination are less tolerated here than in most countries.  But the idea that the rich are the most capable people in society, and the poor are the least capable, simply isn't true.  You can't always inherit talent and creativity, but you can inherit money, connections, and a powerful family name.

Sometimes you can even inherit control of a business, and this is one situation where the costs of abandoning meritocracy have actually been measured.  Francisco Pérez-González, an economist at Stanford (and a close friend of mine from graduate school), studied what happened when companies unexpectedly lost their chief executives.  He found that companies where an heir took over became less profitable, on average, than companies where the successor was unrelated.

Research like this should get the attention of Wall Street just as much as Main Street.  As our meritocracy disappears, we'll be seeing more crummy CEOs, lousy politicians, and a more polarized society.  Lower economic growth, lower corporate profits, and lower prospects for our children will inevitably result.  We can stop these trends, but first we have to acknowledge that eroding meritocracy is at the core of all of them.

 

More from the Big Idea for Thursday, October 10 2013

Extreme Inequality

In today's lesson, the journalist Sasha Abramsky details the expansion of poverty into "corners of the country that didn't experience it in previous decades." In an interview with Jeff Schechtm... Read More…

 

The One Economic Policy Ame...

Newsletter: Share: