What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

How Bush Sent the Protesters to Wall Street

October 10, 2011, 2:23 PM
Tax

Though the Bush administration never admitted it, its tax cuts would almost certainly push the incomes of rich and poor further apart.  As incomes became more widely dispersed, the gap in wealth between rich and poor would quickly grow as well.  Even to a non-economist, the reason was easy to see: all the tax cuts were supposed to raise the return to saving- not just new saving, but existing saving, too - and the rich had much more saving than the poor.

After appraising the situation, you might decide to work a little less and spend more time managing your stock portfolio.  Or, you might try to find ways for your employer to pay you in securities rather than in wages or salaries.  Perhaps you'd buy special shares in your company that were only available to employees, and the shares would pay a divided in lieu ofsalary.  All the income you received as dividends would be tax free, at least until the Internal Revenue Service caught on.  Then you and your employer would have to find another loophole.

Tax lawyers, accountants, and financial planners would be glad to help you find that loophole. With the help of these professionals, huge chunks of income would start shifting way from taxed sources and into untaxed sources.  As a result, the tax base would begin to shrink.

In this race to avoid the grabbing hand of the Internal Revenue Service, the wealthiest people would obviously have had a head start.  They were already receiving a lot of income from dividends, interest payments andthe like, and they were also likely to be on first-name terms with atleast one financial advisor.  The ones who would have the hardest timemaking the switch would be the working Americans who received most oftheir income from the sweat of their brow, or from the stain on the backof their swivel chair.

By the time these folks paid off their debts and started to save on a net basis, wealthier people would have been well on their way to entirely tax-free incomes, leaving the rest of working America to pay the taxes.The fortunate and growing minority who managed to receive all their income from stocks, bonds and other securities would pay nothing - not a dime -for America's cancer research, its international diplomacy, its military deterrent, the maintenance of the interstate highway system, the space program or almost anything else the federal government did.  Broadly speaking, that fortunate minority would be free-riders.

How long would working Americans stand for this sort of thing?  Probably not very long.  The situation would recall the feudalism many of the first Americans were trying to get away from when they left Europe.  It would take only a few more steps to return to medieval times, when the landowning aristocracy levied taxes on the poor peasants to pay for their wars.


I wrote the words above in 2003 for my first book, Neoconomy: George Bush's Revolutionary Gamble With America's Future (PublicAffairs, 2004).

 

 

How Bush Sent the Protester...

Newsletter: Share: