What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

The Selective Wall

May 31, 2007, 9:08 PM
Dabanner

Last December, I wrote about a controversy in Albemarle County, Virginia, where right-wing Christians who sued for and won the right to distribute literature through the public schools' "backpack mail" program were shocked - shocked! - to find out that there were other religions which then wanted to use that program for the same thing. At the time, the example I cited was a local Unitarian church which invited students to a pagan-inspired celebration of the winter holidays.

Now there's a new wrinkle in this case. An even better group has stepped in and is distributing literature through the backpack mail program: Camp Quest, a summer camp explicitly aimed at children of atheist, agnostic and humanist parents. Of course, the conservative Christians who fought this case fully recognize that opening the school to one religious viewpoint means equal access must be given to all religious viewpoints, and they've stated that while they don't agree with the beliefs of Camp Quest, they're more than willing to allow atheists to distribute literature to children as well, and let families decide for themselves who is right.

Just kidding.

In reality, the religious groups who shrieked about persecution when they were denied access to public schools are now shrieking just as loudly that the schools are "promoting atheism" by giving atheists the same access to a public forum as everyone else. Rick Scarborough called it "outrageous" that teachers have to hand out material with which they might personally disagree (a concern, I note, that was entirely absent when Christians like Scarborough were trying to force their way into the school). Some of the teachers are deeply concerned that handing out such material might imply that the school is officially endorsing or establishing atheism. Some are going even farther by refusing to hand out the flyers that they personally do not agree with.

As AU's blog says so well:

If public schools allow private groups to use "backpack mail," they must prohibit teachers from deciding which messages are and are not worthy. It is absolutely unacceptable for public school teachers to decide that one religious belief is "offensive" and "outrageous" but others are not and then promote that perspective in their official capacity.

I could not agree more. Teachers who use their official power to promote ideas that agree with their personal beliefs, and shut out ideas that do not agree with their personal beliefs, should immediately be disciplined or fired. Such an attitude is incompatible with the expectations placed upon every civil servant by the U.S. Constitution.

Judging by the facts of this case, one could be forgiven for thinking that the religious right simply lacks whatever part of the brain it is that allows the rest of us to comprehend basic notions of fairness and equality. When they are not allowed to use the coercive power of government to push their faith, they raise a hue and cry of discrimination, claiming they are being shut out; but when that power is extended to all religious groups, they scream that the government is officially endorsing beliefs that they do not agree with. It seems that nothing would satisfy them except special, preferential treatment for their own beliefs while all others are banned and shut out - which, of course, is exactly what they want.

This is yet another aspect of the selective wall, which I've written about many times before. The selective wall is what leads believers to conclude that special treatment for their beliefs is inherently fair and reasonable, while the same treatment for any beliefs different from their own is a gross injustice and a blatant violation of the separation of church and state. Such people hold an attitude of arrogant, condescending entitlement, believing that they themselves have a special exemption from the rules everyone else must follow, and that any attempt to hold them to the same standard as everyone else is an offensive insult. Doubtless, it is the certainty that they know God's will and that everyone who disagrees is wrong that causes them to act in this way, which is just another illustration of the pernicious effects of faith.

 

The Selective Wall

Newsletter: Share: