I've heard it said that Ron Paul doesn't have enough widespread support, and that's the reason the media is saying so little about him. I was under the impression that it's supposed to be the job of the media to bring us awareness about everything of importance, if there is no conspiracy involved. The news reported the other day about how a man who gave the sports car of his dead son, to his other son, and how Brittani Spears is having a nervous breakdown. That's more relevant than a candidate for Presidency? Can anyone explain to me why this is?
What bothers me is that since Ron Paul has WON every debate he's participated in, wouldn't he be considered relevant news?
If Ron Paul is someone who has radically idiotic ideas, wouldn't it be best to let him be known, so that we can all see why this winner of debates, shouldn't be President?
Could there be more to this?