What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Ohio State Study: Fox News Promotes Belief in False Rumors about NYC Mosque

October 14, 2010, 1:52 PM
Glennbeck

A survey analysis released today by Ohio State researchers finds that Fox News viewing contributes significantly to the spread of false rumors about the New York City mosque.  Moreover, respondents who held these false beliefs were not only more likely to oppose the NYC mosque but also more likely to oppose the building of a mosque in their own communities.

The analysis, based on a survey of 750 Americans, was conducted by my brother Erik Nisbet, an Ohio State professor and expert on Islamophobia, and R. Kelly Garrett, his faculty colleague and an expert on the spread of false rumors.

The survey asked respondents if they believed any of the following four false rumors about the NYC mosque.  These claims have been evaluated as false both by Politifact, a Pulitizer-prize winning service of the St. Petersburg Times, and Factcheck.org, an initiative at the University of Pennsylvania.

  • Feisal Abdul Rauf, the Imam backing the proposed Islamic cultural center and mosque, is a terrorist‐sympathizer who refuses to condemn Islamic attacks on civilians.
  • The Muslim groups building the proposed Islamic cultural center and mosque have deep ties to radical anti‐American and anti‐Semitic organizations.
  • The proposed Islamic cultural center and mosque near Ground Zero is scheduled to open on September 11, 2011 in celebration of the 10‐year anniversary of the World Trade Center attacks.
  • The money for the proposed Islamic cultural center is coming primarily from foreign financial backers associated with terrorist organizations in Saudi Arabia and Iran.

How Belief in False Rumors Varies Across News Audiences

Jeff Grabmeier, at Ohio State’s Research News Office, adeptly summarizes how the researchers then compared whether awareness and belief in these false rumors varied by respondents’ news outlet choices:

Survey participants were all asked to rate how much they relied on various media outlets for their news.  They were also asked whether they heard any of the rumors and if they believed in them.

The results showed how reliance on specific media sources played a strong role in whether people were exposed to the rumors and if they believed them, Nisbet said.

People who said they relied heavily on Fox News, either online or on television, were more aware of the false rumors about the mosque and were more likely to believe these rumors compared to those with low reliance on Fox.

Findings suggest that a typical respondent who reported a low reliance on Fox News believed 0.9 rumors on average, while a similar respondent with a high reliance on Fox believed 1.5 rumors – an increase of 66 percent.

Garrett emphasized that all these comparisons in the study were made while holding constant other variables, including education, party affiliation, ideology, and other media use.

“Our analyses demonstrate that the relationships we found aren’t just a side effect of some other characteristic, such as political ideology or party affiliation,” Garrett said.

“These results suggest that even a well-educated, liberal Democrat would be more likely to believe the rumors, if he relied heavily on Fox for his news.”

Reliance on conservative talk radio had a similar effect on users as did Fox News.  Those with a heavy reliance on conservative talk radio heard on average two rumors, compared to 1.5 rumors for those with a low reliance – an increase of 33 percent.

Respondents who relied heavily on CNN or NPR believed fewer false rumors, the study found.  High reliance on CNN reduced the number of rumors believed by 23 percent, while heavy use of NPR reduced belief by 25 percent.

People who relied heavily on broadcast television news – ABC, CBS or NBC – were less likely to have been exposed to the rumors.  Heavy reliance on those sources was linked to a 22 percent decrease in rumor exposure compared to those with low reliance on those outlets.  That may be because broadcast news had fewer reports on the mosque controversy than did the cable news outlets.

Belief in False Rumors Promotes Opposition to Mosques

The spread of misinformation and false rumors by Fox News has significant implications for tolerance in American society, say the Ohio State researchers:

The findings suggest that among those who believed none of the four rumors, two-thirds are opposed to the proposed [NYC mosque].  But that increases to 82 percent among those who believed three or more rumors.

Even more dramatic is the effect that belief in these rumors has on support for mosques outside of New York, said Erik Nisbet, co-author of the study and assistant professor of communication at Ohio State University.

Results suggest that predicted opposition to building of a mosque in the respondent’s own neighborhood increased from 39 percent among people who believed none of the rumors to 63 percent among those who believed three or more of the rumors.

“These rumors have a negative effect well beyond the specific controversy in New York City,” Nisbet said.

“They seem to shape attitudes about Muslims and their role in our society, no matter where we live.  That’s a big concern.”

Example of Fox News' Glenn Beck Promoting False Rumors

A search of You Tube turns up dozens of clips featuring the types of false claims surveyed in the report.  Here’s one especially revealing clip.  Watch as Glenn Beck promotes false claims about Imam Rauf while arguing that the NYC mosque debate is in fact an example of too much tolerance in American society and of a mainstream news media that is unwilling to report the facts and provide context to the debate.

 

 

See also:

Full Report on Fox News and Belief in False Rumors about NYC Mosque

What is Islamophobia?

The Islamic Cultural Center: A Failure in Storytelling

Former CBS News Political Editor on Politics, TV News, and Education in the Glenn Beck Era

Follow Age of Engagement on Twitter.

tumblr visit counter

More from the Big Idea for Thursday, October 14 2010

 

Ohio State Study: Fox News ...

Newsletter: Share: