What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more


February 27, 2011, 6:26 PM

What do we think about when we hear the word “revolution” today? The Beatles? Tahrir Square? The word has a rich history in political rhetoric, and in particular in political speeches—primarily those given by the revolutionaries in the time of revolution. Yet as America watches events that certainly look like what we think about when we think about revolutions, both here and abroad, let’s remember the time an American President spoke about the revolution most central to our patriotic psyche: our own. The New Yorker this week gave news of that magical speech, one many of us know almost by heart: John F. Kennedy’s First Inaugural Address.

Here is the paragraph containing a reference to a “revolution:”

The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forbears fought are still at issue around the globe—the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.

We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans—born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage—and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

The New Yorker piece was written by Adam Frankel, one of President Obama’s speechwriters who also formerly worked for Ted Sorenson. Sorenson was more than JFK’s close advisor; he was the speechwriter commonly credited with not only having written parts of the Pulitzer Prize-winning “Profiles in Courage,” but also for having written drafts of this Address, also known as the Ask Not Speech. As Frankel explains in the article, he discovered a previously unearthed draft of this speech at the house of one of Sorenson's former secretaries, named Gloria Sittrin. This new draft ultimately made its way to our current White House and our current President:

After lunch, I asked the Sitrins if I could make a copy of the draft. I took it upstairs, thinking that the President might be interested in seeing it. He was standing in the outer Oval Office when I entered. I handed him the draft, explaining how Sorensen had torn up the first one, and how Sitrin had kept this one in a box for fifty years.

“This is unbelievable,” he said, sitting down with it in a chair by his secretary’s desk. He then went downstairs to meet Gloria Sitrin. “Hello, Mr. President,” she said, a phrase she hadn’t uttered in fifty years.

The anecdote is an elegant echo of the image so widely reproduced of young Bill Clinton shaking JFK’s hand. While different, these three men—Kennedy, Clinton and Obama—share more than a love of history; they share a love for language. Yet while each in his time confronted the specter of a foreign “revolution,” only Kennedy took the word back. And by tying the idea of “revolutionaries” to “us,” he tied his audience not only to their history, but to their feelings. We are all revolutionaries, now. He made us want more. He assured us that we—and our country—were worth it.


A READING On Revolution: PR...

Newsletter: Share: