What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Is Ryan Sacrificing 2016 Presidential Hopes?

August 11, 2012, 10:39 AM

My Twitter timeline started buzzing Friday evening with the news that Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan would be the GOP vice presidential nominee. The only reason I can think of for political journalists to begin calling this a “bold pick” is because they have gotten bored with the task of chronicling the rookie mistakes the Romney campaign makes on a daily basis.  I am convinced that the methodology behind the selection of Ryan is likely to be as flawed as the Romney decision to refuse to release any meaningful amount of complete tax returns.

Even though I am not particularly fond of Ryan’s brand of politics, to the Wisconsin congressman’s credit, he is one of the few members of Congress who has actually taken seriously the task of being a people’s representative, offering his own solution to the fiscal crisis the federal government faces. “If you’re going to criticize, then you should propose,” says Ryan in a recent New Yorker profile. If Mitt Romney was running on his signature Massachusetts healthcare plan, this duo would present the most dynamic conservative policy positions we’ve seen in decades on a Republican presidential ticket.

The Romney campaign’s embrace of Paul Ryan is a lot like a professional football team that decides to build its offense around the strengths of their second string quarterback. The only time a professional team used to builds its offense around a second string quarterback was when he was a first round draft pick quarterback who needed to ride the bench for a year until he got some seasoning, but represented the future of the franchise.

Nowadays first round draft picks start right away, with such an enormous amount of pressure to perform that many of these players are doomed from the start. The obvious takeaway from this analogy is my own belief that Romney is no longer running his own campaign. In my opinion, the men behind the SuperPAC money on the sidelines have too much riding on this to let Romney continue to embarrass the Republican Party.           

I almost feel sorry for Ryan. It must have been one a helluva sales pitch that got him to accept this offer. In modern times, the only vice presidential candidate on a losing ticket who has ever gone on to win the White House was Franklin D. Roosevelt.  The conventional wisdom among Beltway insiders the last few days suggested that Republican party power brokers were pushing for Ryan. I wouldn’t be surprised if one of the main reasons behind choosing Ryan was his availability - he may have been one of the few candidates with a national presence who was willing to be a sacrificial lamb in the 2012 election cycle.

Many national journalists are even now typing the words “this election is now a choice” between Paul Ryan’s budget plan and the Obama administration’s track record. If that’s the case, then Mitt Romney is merely a figurehead who needs to sit this one out and ask his delegates to throw their support to Ryan as the nominee.


Is Ryan Sacrificing 2016 Pr...

Newsletter: Share: