What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Missing Link: New Van Gogh Painting Authenticated

March 6, 2010, 11:18 AM

Just when you think you’ve seen them all, a new Vincent Van Gogh painting rises from seemingly nowhere. An 1886 painting titled Le Blute-Fin Mill (pictured) recently became the first “new” Van Gogh to be authenticated since 1995. What new things does this painting tell us about the Van Gogh we thought we knew? More importantly, what does this painting tell us about the Van Gogh who never was?

An art curator named Dirk Hannema bought Le Blute-Fin Mill in 1975 from a Parisian antique and art dealer for 5,000 Dutch guilders ($2,700). Convinced he had a genuine Van Gogh in his hands, Hannema immediately insured the painting for 16 times more than what he paid. Alas, Hannema couldn’t convince anyone else that the painting was the genuine article. The almost cheery demeanor of the painting and the scene of multiple people climbing stairs in the Montmartre district of Paris near a mill seemed too different from other Van Goghs, although the prominence of the mill itself jived with other works by him. This almost happy painting couldn’t be from Vincent’s fevered brain, conventional wisdom held. Hannema hung Le Blute-Fin Mill in his home until his death in 1984, going to his grave certain that he was right and everyone else was wrong. Nearly a quarter of a century later, the experts finally agree with Dirk.

In defense of the critics who rejected Hannema’s claims, Hannema’s curatorial judgment was questionable. In the 1930s, Hannema bought what he thought was a Vermeer that later proved not to be. But in defense of Hannema, the Vermeer craze of the 1930s and 1940s, fueled in no small part by a large number of art forgers and the collecting lust of prominent Nazis such as Hitler and Goering, clouded the judgment of many minds in the art world. Unfortunately, however, Hannema could never shake the tag of crackpot when it came to spotting lost masterpieces.

What I find most interesting about this new discovery is how it represents a “missing link” in the evolution of the artist we know now as “Van Gogh.” In 1886, Van Gogh came to Paris and discovered the Impressionists, leaving behind the dark palette of his Potato Eaters days. It was a moment in his life when several possibilities loomed before him. When first looking at Le Blute-Fin Mill, I thought it was a pale imitation of an early Monet, or maybe even Monet’s sensibility passed down second or even third hand to the impressionable young Van Gogh. I picture this painting as the moment when Van Gogh came to two paths converging in a wood and chose the path less taken, which has made all the difference to him, and to us.

Imagine for a moment Van Gogh taking the other path. Imagine a parallel universe where Van Gogh never develops his feverish style, follows Monet and the other Impressionists, never breaks down, and never dies in his romantically tragic way. Imagine a Van Gogh who find love and settles down, who happily grows old with children bustling about, and who never needs to cut off his ear on a lonely Christmas Eve. Do we even learn the name of that Van Gogh? Is the mythos of the tortured genius, which goes beyond Van Gogh but owes much of its power to fascinate from him, ever the same?

To me, Le Blute-Fin Mill will always be a fascinating “What if?” Just as limbs of the family tree of human evolution branched out and withered, never to be heard from again in the long march to who we are as a species, here is a branch in the family tree of art history that withered and died, perhaps for the betterment of art itself, if not for the personal welfare of Van Gogh himself. Van Gogh didn’t need to be “Van Gogh.” But we still need him to be.


Missing Link: New Van Gogh ...

Newsletter: Share: